Poorly balanced 4001?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- leftyguitars
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2818
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:44 am
- Contact:
Jeff, the supplement, do you bathe in it or smoke it?
"If only quilted maple grew on trees!"
http://www.leftyguitars.co.uk
http://www.leftyguitars.co.uk
My 72' 4001 weighs 9 lb's and my 74' 4001 (w/Bad-*** II Bridge) is 9.5 lb's.


http://www.myspace.com/greenvilleglorylane
Rickenbacker; '72 FireGlo 4001, '81 JetGlo 4001. '90 Alembic Flame-Koa Persuader.
Custom Hand-Made(Self) 4-String Natural Maple Bass.
Ampeg B-15R & B-15E Bass Amp (2-15 All-Tube 100w Stack, both S/N 1)
Rickenbacker; '72 FireGlo 4001, '81 JetGlo 4001. '90 Alembic Flame-Koa Persuader.
Custom Hand-Made(Self) 4-String Natural Maple Bass.
Ampeg B-15R & B-15E Bass Amp (2-15 All-Tube 100w Stack, both S/N 1)
Both of the 4003S/5's I used to have were 9.5 lbs. Heaviest bass I have ever had was a Les Paul recording. I think neck dive is when the bass dives below even. The balanced bass when let go should drop to even horizontal. Gibson Thunderbirds (or at least the one I had) would hit the ground almost if I let it nose dive. As evidenced by the broken head. Now thats neck dive. Not sure about the new ones. I have heard that they are better balanced than the older ones. The 4004CII5 is perfectly balanced.


The balance is a partly a function of the upper horn. Longer upper horn allows the instrument to rest at a more upright angle. The Les Paul has no horn and will tend to hang closer to the 3:00 position if not lower. Short horn Alembics have the same tendency. The 4000 series in stock trim will hang about 1:30 quite nicely where the 2000 series basses hang closer to 3:00. If you are lefty that would be 11:30 and 9:00. 

- atomic_punk
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
- Contact:
I'm starting to suspect sore shoulder comes more from a bass being too unbalanced rather than it just being outright heavy. The Badass bridge weighs a LOT more than the stock bridge, and my 4001 is now noticably heavier, but it's also better balanced now. I'm thinking of putting on ultralites, and that should make it perfectly balanced.
Has anyone noticed a change in tone with the ultralites?
Has anyone noticed a change in tone with the ultralites?
- atomic_punk
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
- Contact:
They do not glow in the dark, but it was "none more black", so I decided to make it show up a little better
It's a Hamer 12, the king of neck dive, and a HEAVY sucker too! I sometimes call it the 'divining rod' since it tends to seek water in the ground if I let it go...
Ted, there are a lot of ways to snap a T-bird headstock off, but that is a very thin joint and if it gets knocked over, etc., that's where the stress tends to go.
It's a Hamer 12, the king of neck dive, and a HEAVY sucker too! I sometimes call it the 'divining rod' since it tends to seek water in the ground if I let it go... Ted, there are a lot of ways to snap a T-bird headstock off, but that is a very thin joint and if it gets knocked over, etc., that's where the stress tends to go.
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009

