4003

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
imnoone
New member
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:57 am

4003

Post by imnoone »

Hey all, I'm looking for your expert opinions on whether this 1980 4003 is sporting a thick neck or a thinner one.
http://www.leedavila.com/ricfull.jpg
http://www.leedavila.com/ricneck.jpg

I'm considering it, but probably need a thinner necked one for my smaller mitts. Thanks!
User avatar
bob_atherton
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:47 am

Post by bob_atherton »

Lee, I have found that necks of this vintage are thicker than the early to mid 70's ones but thinner than a new 4003. Is there any way to try it out?

Very nice looking bass BTW
User avatar
bob_atherton
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:47 am

Post by bob_atherton »

Oh yes, FWIW I also have small mitts and that is why I play RICs. the slightly shorter scale to me is more useful than the neck being super skinny.
green_us90
Intermediate Member
Posts: 530
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 12:23 pm

Post by green_us90 »

Wow.

THe fingerboard is nice and dark, and the finish looks great.

WHat Bob said.
Gitch-Pang, Gitch-Pang- the RIC trademark
imnoone
New member
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:57 am

Post by imnoone »

Great, thanks much for your help! I'm hoping to go mano-a-mano with it sometime this week. I'll let you know how it turns out. Overall, the bass is in good condition, save some belt-buckle finish chipping.
User avatar
banta
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 5:00 am

Post by banta »

I think it looks pretty typical of a 4003. It may be a little thicker than an older 4001, but nothing you won't be able to adapt to easily.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

I have 4 4001's from the late 70's. A 76, 77, 79, and an 80. All have similar(and very nice) thin necks. I also have a couple mid-80's 4003's that feel similar to the late 70's 4001s. There is some variation in neck thickness due to hand sanding at the factory. But my call is that its hard to go wrong with a Rick neck from this era.
Play what you love, love what you play!
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Yes, I have both 78 and 79 4001's and an 81 4003, the 4003 is exactly like the 4001's except for the backwards truss rods, the neck on the 4003 is very thin, it is thinner than my 78 which also illustrates what Jeff has said about the hand sanding.
User avatar
thinneckrick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:59 am
Contact:

Post by thinneckrick »

Every rick i have ever owned had different necks. The thinnest one i have seen yet has been a 90 4003. I have two 86's right now with thinner necks.I have had 3 74's only one had a truly thin neck.I also had an 81 4001's with a thinner neck . Everyone talks about 70's necks being so thin and for the most part they are not. They have more of a flat profile but are still kind of thick overall where as a 4003 has rounder profile . i have never owned a 60's rick so i have know opinion on those. Bottom line is as i said before they are all different .Chronically inconsistent. I have had to buy sell and trade alot to get different rics for the neck profiles i desire. literally dozens of times over.
im getting to old for this ****
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

I have two 4001's a 78 and a 79, and also have an 81 4003, they are all exactly the same except for the reversed truss rods and split pickguard in the 4003. The 4003 neck is actually a little thinner than my 78 4001 which proves Jeff's sanding point. If it's all original it will still have the cap in it.
User avatar
pekka
Member
Posts: 244
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 7:34 pm
Contact:

Post by pekka »

"The thinnest one i have seen yet has been a 90 4003."

I have a '91 4003 and the neck feels very thin and comfortable, thinner than my friends '89 and definitely more thinner than his '03. I also remember that my other friends '75 4001 felt a lot "blockier".Image
apollo11
Intermediate Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 6:00 am

Post by apollo11 »

Have you seen the bass in person? I'm wondering if the TRC is a little odd. The picture you submitted is pretty crisp, but the headstock looks blurrier than the rest of the image, and the lettering of the TRC is very light, much lighter than any other part of the picture. There appears to be some blotchiness on the headstock, too. Just curious.

Here is an enlargement:
http://img270.imageshack.us/img270/6185/ricfull4xy.jpg
Andrew
'05 4001C64, Fireglo
'03 4003, Jetglo
imnoone
New member
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:57 am

Post by imnoone »

I haven't seen it in person yet. When I do, I'll be sure to have a long look at the TRC. I was told that the owner had it refretted with slightly taller frets and that at least one of the pickups had been rewound by Jason Lollar. I'm still waiting on the guy to respond. He's looking for a hollowbody guitar in trade and I have a 2000 Gretsch Nashville w/ Lindy Fralin P-90s that I don't play much. Fingers are crossed!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”