PB-1 project

bobcat · Post by **bobcat** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 7:12 am

*GASP* Walnut wings AND skunk stripe!!! BEST THING EVER!!!

rickfan60 · Post by **rickfan60** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 7:25 am

It conjures up that 60's 4005 look.

bassduke49 · Post by **bassduke49** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 7:43 am

Zactly! And then there will be the new color. What will it be? Hmm.

rickfan60 · Post by **rickfan60** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 11:59 am

I like the way Dale shaped the wings on Dave's bass. They are more like the ones on the big headstock 4000 series. Perhaps I will try that with yours, Paul.

bassduke49 · Post by **bassduke49** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 2:11 pm

Please do. I always thought the headstock looked kinda pudgy.

aceonbass · Post by **aceonbass** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 3:28 pm

Just my 2 cents worth, but I wouldn't use Grovers on a walnut headstock conversion. I don't think it would look right. Instead, I'd get a set of unstamped Schaller vintage style tuners which look more correct. And by the way, I don't understand why anyone would take the paint stripper approach to a bass or guitar. It mucks up the wood and plastic and besides, the hand sanding process gets me in touch with the instrument and the ZEN-like state that ensues is great to get the creative juices flowing on a project.

rickfan60 · Post by **rickfan60** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 4:56 pm

I have at least one set of 70's vintage tuners here.

bassduke49 · Post by **bassduke49** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 6:00 pm

Thanks Dane, for your input, but the bass was fudged ("only I didn't say fudged") up by yours truly when I bought it used. I wanted to change the finish on it because it was chipped badly in the back. I knew I could apply a new finish because I knew how to airbrush. But I was young and foolish. I used ZipStrip on it, and that chewed into the position markers and binding, but before all was lost, I wiped it off and proceeded. This was in 1975. I know that pre-1973 basses are collectible and I know why, but there's no sense trying to make this one look like a brand new '72. It's way past that, so now I want to have it look unique with some of the features I really like. I kinda like the Grovers and the Toaster, but a few years ago I had installed a new high-gain in the bridge, replaced the old (split) tailpiece that had its chrome flaking off. So it's not going to be a like-new '72, and its not going to remain with all my sins on display. It's now going to be a like a hot rod made from a '32 Ford V8 chassis. So, it will have new binding, new frets, old tuners, one old and one new pickup, and a dazzling paint job, color yet to be determined. Kinda like what's his name does to those old 3000s. What's his name? Uh, Dale? No, Duane? No ...

rickfan60 · Post by **rickfan60** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:09 am

You will have to speak a little louder until I get my new ears!

bassduke49 · Post by **bassduke49** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:31 am

What?

incubus2432 · Post by **incubus2432** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:35 am

That looks perfect the way it is!

rikk · Post by **rikk** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 12:31 pm

It hurts just looking at it. You should be posting things like that. At least you didn't post a picture of the blade going through. THAT would have been PAINFUL.

rickfan60 · Post by **rickfan60** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 1:06 pm

No blade, I carefully heated the glue in the lamination until it let go. The trick is to not heat the center laminations too much.

rikk · Post by **rikk** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 1:38 pm

Ted, That makes me feel better. I think?

rickfan60 · Post by **rickfan60** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 3:06 pm

The walnut ears have been cut and are now ready for attachment. First the upper one.......

Then the lower....

The next step is to hand sand them so they blend into the maple and look like they had always been there.