Bass/guitar/amp;s worst gimmicks

Off Topic discussion forum

Moderators: ajish4, cjj

throw_this_away
Intermediate Member
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:59 am
Contact:

Bass/guitar/amp;s worst gimmicks

Post by throw_this_away »

The bass world has far fewer gimmicks than the guitar world has (especially when it comes to amps), but some of them make me laugh.

Just wanted people to post their favorite (least favorite) gimmicks in bass, guitar or amps.

I'll start with the easy target... "vintage reissues" are not a gimmick at all to me, "artist series" are a minor gimmick (how many artist series strats are there that are all the same?), and Fender "relic" finishes are just silly.
tomg
Member
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 12:36 pm
Contact:

Post by tomg »

There's a lot of differentiation in the various Fender artist series instruments.
loendmaestro
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1495
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:53 pm
Contact:

Post by loendmaestro »

How about those goofy new Fender Rumble amps with the red flashing light underneath the speaker?
throw_this_away
Intermediate Member
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:59 am
Contact:

Post by throw_this_away »

I was thinking of those when I was writing this. But then it could be useful... just as a backup to let you know you are playing.

The ric lightshow was a huge gimmick... but then it is a gimmic that I would love to own.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

Lightshows, converter combs, slanted frets, rednecks, blackstars, tuxedos - all gimmicks.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13212
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Post by rickenbrother »

Daisy Rock guitars?...well, I guess to pre teen girls, they are cool.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
billy_sacco
Junior Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 2:16 pm

Post by billy_sacco »

I would say most modern bass specific effects. The aged strat thing is just stupid to me. Paying 2k for a brand new instrument that is already messed up just seems a bit strange.
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

"and Fender 'relic' finishes are just silly"

Tell that to the Fender Custom Shop. They have a hard time supplying the demand. To each their own, I guess... I happen to think it's a great idea. You get the best of both worlds. You get a "broken in" feel, like old slippers, like stonewashed jeans. But you get that without someone else's goo. It's a brand new instrument that welcomes you like you've played it since you were 16. I like the concept.

Historically speaking, burst finishes are an early form of "relic'ing". The dark brown sunburst finish started as an attempt to replicate old violins, where the lacquer gets darker near the edges.

But what do I know... I still think that the low B string is a fad. Image

The worst guitar gimmick IMHO is the cutout carrying handle in Steve Vai's Ibanezes.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
simonmole
Junior Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 10:17 pm

Post by simonmole »

i'm pretty neutral about these relic "pre aged" guitars - but I'd LOVE to be the bloke at the end of the production line with the hammer... what a way to get in the mood for the weekend....
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2785
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Post by henry5 »

LOL!

Got to say I like the relic idea. I'm not a big fan of instruments that look or feel "new". The worst thing to me is something absolutely spotless; it just has no character. Particularly if it's a Fender; they only look right to me when they're really worn (like Jaco's Jazz). So I agree with Ilan completely, a broken in feel, a cool look (I actually prefer wear on my instruments), but (hopefully) no structural/electrical issues/problems. Of course I'd prefer a blinding original, but you can't always find them. Or you have to pay through the nose...although of course the relics aren't cheap.

To be honest, flatwounds, roundwounds, even Ricks, they've all been in and out of popularity. The electric bass was considered a fad once...
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle."
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2785
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Post by henry5 »

Actually, it's not a gimmick as such, but the thing that annoys me most is cabs with tweeters which you can't adjust/turn off or on...
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle."
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

Wanna see some extreme "relic'ing"? click here and scroll down. Some of their work looks pretty convincing.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
charlyg
Senior Member
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:01 am

Post by charlyg »

gimmick - 1 a : a mechanical device for secretly and dishonestly controlling gambling apparatus b : an ingenious or novel mechanical device : GADGET
2 a : an important feature that is not immediately apparent : CATCH b : an ingenious and usually new scheme or angle
User avatar
bobcat
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:54 pm

Post by bobcat »

"converter combs"

Wait, are those those thingies that are on 12-string guitars that dampen the octave strings so that it's basically a 6-string? How on earth is that a gimmick? I was under the impression that a gimmick was a feature or quality of a product that looks cool/gets people to notice but is, in actuality, pretty much useless. Gimmicks are things that exist pretty much only to make people notice. Sure you could probably carry the Steve Vai guitar by that handle-thing, but it's really only there because it looks weird and different.

A converter comb, if it is what I think it is, seems to me to be an incredibly practical feature, and therefore, the opposite of a gimmick. It's like calling a Hipshot drop-tuner a gimmick.

For me, the only gimmicks that annoy me are "relic" finishes, i.e. guitars and basses that are beat up out of the factory. To me, that's not like buying pre-faded jeans; it's buying pre-RIPPED jeans. Fender have hit a goldmine there because they know there are hundreds and thousands of people who think that peeling finishes, dents, haphazard screw holes and rusty hardware equal a better instrument. Sorry, but, when I see an instrument that looks like that, my first impression is not, "Wow, can you feel the mojo?" or "Wow, that must be a great instrument!" It's "Wow, whoever owned that obviously didn't care about it very much." And even then, there's a big difference between a guitar that has been played so much that it's worn, and a guitar that has never been played but is in fact strategically designed to LOOK like you've played it for years. One of them was consciously chosen as something be played and played hard. The other is a brand new instrument with the cost jacked up because it's beat up in the factory.

One word = Gimmick. Smart business, but, I feel, hardly respectable.
User avatar
revolver323
Intermediate Member
Posts: 997
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:48 am
Contact:

Post by revolver323 »

The Acoustic 360 Bass Amp has an "electronic tuning fork" built in that is continuously variable, with no detents on the knob and no indication of what frequency it was producing. Absolutely useless ... unless you crank up the amp's other gimmick -- a built in fuzz --- and go gonzo with the tuning fork knob during a solo. Then it sounds like a Moog!
Post Reply

Return to “The Others: by CJ Johansson”