How rare is the 4001 Deluxe?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
bobcat
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:54 pm

Post by bobcat »

Dave, if you ever manage to get that Steinberger back, I'd gladly take it. I think, for your sake, you've gotta stop "retiring".
User avatar
revolver323
Intermediate Member
Posts: 997
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:48 am
Contact:

Post by revolver323 »

I am unretired, permanently. Now with a Lakland 55-94 that will not be sold, ever. Well .. maybe for $1 million.
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Post by bassduke49 »

Yeah, '72s are fairly rare on the secondary market, if eBay is any indication. Collectors grab them up and pay pretty high prices if one is in good or great condition. If your's is a '72, it definitely had the "skunk" stripe, even if under paint.

I've got a '72 Mapleglo currently under restoration (see "PB-1 project" thread). Ted Staberow is rebinding, dressing the fingerboard, refretting, and sanding it in preparation of a new finish by Paul Wilcynski next month (I hope). You can get to see a lot of "nekid" shots of it in that thread.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
nattiep
Advanced Member
Posts: 2389
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 8:33 pm

Post by nattiep »

"Since mine was Jetglo, I never knew if it had the skunkstripe."

My '76 is jetglo, and I just look at the back on the bass in the light. I can see though the finish (Well not really, just the neck shows) and I see the neck in three pieces.
1976 Rickenbacker 4001
2011/05 Fender Standard Fretless Jazz Bass
2005/11 Fender Standard Jazz Bass
j_gary
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:47 pm

Post by j_gary »

Any idea what a 70-73 is worth these days?
I'm just happy to be here.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

The early 70's basses have been going for between $2000 and $3000 depending on color and condition. Some are offered for a lot more and sometimes get it. In the case of '73, the early ones have the nice appointments and the later ones look like '74 examples. The plain '73s are not nearly as valuable.
j_gary
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:47 pm

Post by j_gary »

Wow, thanks Ted. Sounds like the pivot point is 73. Early = $3000, late and after = $1500.

Is this primarily a cosmetic thing, or did the sound and feel change? Would a V63 or C64 offer the same sound and feel?
I'm just happy to be here.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

Late '73s go for about what '74s of the same color are getting - ~$1000 these days.

IMHO It is all about the look. The binding and inlays don't do much for the sound, they are only eye candy. As for the V63 and C64, they have hotter pickups and are made a bit differently. Seeing as they are genetic relatives, they can sound something like their ancestors. Feel is another story. The necks are more or less the same width but have different shapes.
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

1973 is the pivot point. AFAIK (please correct me if I haven't got it right), Jan-Apr '73 had checkerboard and full width inlays, May-Aug had checkerboard but the inlays were the "new" style, and Sep-Dec is plain binding, and isn't different from a '74 (and therefore worth about the same).

Ted, from what I see on eBay, late '73 and '74s usually go for a bit more than $1,000. I'd say about $1,200. $1,000 is quite a bargain for an unmodified '74 in any color.

"IMHO It is all about the look."

+1
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
j_gary
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:47 pm

Post by j_gary »

What was the first year of the 4001?
I'm just happy to be here.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

1961
User avatar
chefothefuture
Advanced Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am

Post by chefothefuture »

Supposedly 1961. I've never seen one. I'd like to see one;
they must be pretty nifty.
The earliest I've held was a 1963.
'68 4001MG, '70 4001 21Fret, '71 4001S MG, '71 4001FG, '72 4001AZ, '73 4001FG, '73 4001resto, '59 365FG, '96 381/12v69FG, '71 4001 21Fret FG
j_gary
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:47 pm

Post by j_gary »

Should I ask what 61 would be worth?

Very different from a 71-73?
I'm just happy to be here.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

Yes, very different from an early 70's. Early 60's 4001s are quite expensive these days. Pre '65 examples (in good condition) usually sell for more than $7000. A '61 (there were only a few made) would probably be well over $12,000. Pre '69 are getting up there too. In my experience, $5000 to $7000 is not unusual.
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

It's getting hard to put a certain price on any 60's Rickenbacker bass these days. They have reached the stage where a general figure simply cannot apply anymore and each bass has to be taken on it's own merit and negotiated accordingly.

I think if you pick anything up for under $5K your doing very well, with good original examples (if you can find one) close to the 5 figure mark.

The early 70's basses are appreciating real fast too. Get one while you can!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”