Geoff Emerick's Book
Geoff Emerick's Book
Fascinating and creative look from Emerick's side as the Beatles second engineer, as well as their assistant engineer from almost the beginning of their careers. Decent read thus far (I haven't finished it all), and it seems it would be worth the investment for anyone, IMO.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Music is too important to be left to professionals.
Music is too important to be left to professionals.
Here's an interesting read about the book...
http://www.daytrippin.com/letters.htm
http://www.daytrippin.com/letters.htm
Yep. I subscribe to daytrippin and got that also. I read 'em all .... and I read 'em with a grain of salt. Even Paul and Ringo's accounts are fuzzy about certain events....
I've got soooo many "Beatle" books .... I could start a small library.
I've got soooo many "Beatle" books .... I could start a small library.
1973 4001 MG cb fwi
1986 4003 Shadow
2012 4004Cii FG w/gold trim
1986 4003 Shadow
2012 4004Cii FG w/gold trim
Be careful with that read? Like any of us will really know. The guy engineered them from '66 on, so I figure he was somewhat close, don't you think? Foggy memory, likely, but we aren't perfect.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Music is too important to be left to professionals.
Music is too important to be left to professionals.
-
chingnchime
- Member
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:54 am
Great. The 'definitive' studio story and no one can agree on it. I have to agree that few people can recall specific word for word conversations after 40 years, and it's a pet peeve of mine that writers 'reconstruct'entire conversations to suit their purpose. Has there been any comment from Paul on its factuality?
I dare say that when it comes to a number of articles, assorted publications or books about the Beatles not everyone is going to be at 100% agreement on them, likely ever. We might all agree they were British.
Steve, I doubt if you would enjoy it much because there is significant 'reconstructed' dialogue. McCartney may be very pleased with the book, factuality aside. Emerick paints a pretty rosy picture of him from what I've read so far.
Steve, I doubt if you would enjoy it much because there is significant 'reconstructed' dialogue. McCartney may be very pleased with the book, factuality aside. Emerick paints a pretty rosy picture of him from what I've read so far.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Music is too important to be left to professionals.
Music is too important to be left to professionals.
What can you say...they're buddies!
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
-
shamustwin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5287
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am
Most books I've read (Beatle related) have not been harsh on Paul, except the Lennon bio books, where the authors always seem to feed on any supposed rivalry . Maybe there's a slight chance Macca is and was a cheerful, nice guy. He sure liked to work (record, tour, schmooze) so perhaps that's why he comes out smelling like a rose to those he worked with.
Mike, I got it at Barnes and Noble on Tuesday. There seems to have been some confusion on the release date. I could have ordered it through B&N (not an advance order BTW) last week off their website.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Music is too important to be left to professionals.
Music is too important to be left to professionals.

