4001 CS Certificate and 4001v63 Sea Green

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

ken_james
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 940
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2001 11:57 am
Contact:

Post by ken_james »

Hippie tells me that he'll sell it back one of these days, so I basically waiting to get back home and see if he wants to give it up!
User avatar
tsarter
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2002 6:06 am

Post by tsarter »

As it is one of two Rics he owns but never plays I suspect it will come home some day. It is a nice contrast to his Tux though.

Here's a link to my pair. They are both trying to stay with me now:


http://www.sitesolid.com/tsarter/easterbass.jpg

Tim
User avatar
paul_yan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2119
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 2:09 pm
Contact:

Post by paul_yan »

Whoa,breathtaking pair, Tim!
Very very nice.
ken_james
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 940
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2001 11:57 am
Contact:

Post by ken_james »

Nice choice, any ideas on the production number and mfg date of the CS?
As for Hippie, the deal we made was for the pair, it's gonna be high but hey it's only money right?
eddier
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 10:20 am
Contact:

Post by eddier »

Nice basses Tim.
One question: are the frets on the Chris Squire model larger/thicker then on the SeaGreen? Or is that just an illusion from the photograph?
He walked out to face his arch-enemies with his arch-supporters.
User avatar
tsarter
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2002 6:06 am

Post by tsarter »

Thank you,Paul. I'm rather fond of them myself!

James, Hippie's Tux/Black Star pair is a fine one - best of luck. I played his Tux once, A/B'd it with my Sea Green. I liked it a lot.

About the mfg date on my CS, if I recall correctly the C6 part of the serial number would indicate it was made in March of '93. I suspect that is nearing the end of production for this model.

Edmond, that is not an illusion. The frets on the CS are much larger than those on the V63. Not sure what the norm is.
ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

hey if you gotta keep one, keep the sea green.

Its the most striking bass i have EVER seen.

And in my opinion its better to have your own unique "normal" instrument, rather than some signiture thing
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
jeff_ulmer
Intermediate Member
Posts: 873
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jeff_ulmer »

The 4001CS was still being made in 2000/2001. I got mine in 1999 and it was in the low 800s.

I would keep the green one myself.
User avatar
tsarter
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2002 6:06 am

Post by tsarter »

I agree with you both, Owen and Jeff. The green one is the one to keep. I'm really trying to manager both though. The CS is a great player,and already has a bit of wear while the green one is so pristine I almost hate to gig with it. I say almost as I'm a firm believer and using and playing any instrument I own - that's what they are made for.
jeff_ulmer
Intermediate Member
Posts: 873
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jeff_ulmer »

While I use all my instruments, that doesn't mean I'd gig with them all. Some are more expendable than others. I'd keep the green one at home, myself. There is no point risking an accident with a rare instrument, if at all possible.
User avatar
tsarter
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2002 6:06 am

Post by tsarter »

Yes - very true. As long as it is being played though. I feel sorry for fine instruments that never get played. I've gigged with my Sea Green on a few special occasions, but would not want to do so on a regular basis, which is why the CS with some previous wear appeals to me. Now if only I couild get my wife to understand this reasoning...
ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

Gigging wont harm a guitar, unless you are very destructive!Image In my opinion, a rare instrument should be played and gigged, unless its fragile. Apart from being unusually green, its a normal Rickenbacker Bass.

My Rick bass is a 4003 from 91, its white with the black trim & hardware. The nature of it being white is that its covered with black case marks and yellow patchs, but thats what happens. Okay so its nor rare, but its not a colour you see everyday! But i gig with it constantly because its Great!!!
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
User avatar
tsarter
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2002 6:06 am

Post by tsarter »

I can agree. I have basses that I've done a lot of gigs with that are still in fine shape. I've always been one to care for my instruments carefully. But then again, how many gigs do you do where an "unusually green" bass is appropriate? I must say that I certainly have a lot of fun with this bass when I do play out with it!
jeff_ulmer
Intermediate Member
Posts: 873
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jeff_ulmer »

I am very anal when it comes to keeping new guitars new, especially rare ones, so gigging isn't on the plate for those ones. They also risk being lost or stolen, or that accidental knock over when waiting to be played.

There is something to be said for a well worn used instrument. I just don't want to be the cause of it. Image
User avatar
tsarter
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2002 6:06 am

Post by tsarter »

I love buying guitars from folks like you Jeff! J
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”