Why 1979?

Transition years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1973-1983 inclusive

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15124
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

If John is willing to take on an additional five years, and Bob is willing to give up five years, it is fine by me.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

Sounds fair, Peter. I'll hope that Bob will still chime in to add whatever he considers relevent, he's owned a lot of stuff from this period...
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

Whoops. I said I didn't mean to cause any trouble! Actually, the only reason I asked was because my first Rick was a '79.
This is off the record
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15124
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

No trouble at all Glenn. It is an acceptable rationale and the topic titles have been adjusted accordingly.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
BobKat
Advanced Member
Posts: 1712
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:18 am

Post by BobKat »

Indeed, it was a change for the better.
tblair
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 241
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2000 12:52 pm
Contact:

Post by tblair »

For me, the cutoff is 1972.

...so if I ever have anything to say about a Ric made between 1973 & 1984, I'll put it in the 1985+ category.
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

Those are artifacts, Tony. Image
beatcomber
Member
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 6:00 am

Post by beatcomber »

Well, whaddya know. I influenced a change in the Rick Forum! Image

Now my '84 330 is officially vintage! (I bought it brand new w/case for $590 + tax in May '84.)
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

What about C series guitars? Are they accurate to the point of being vintage? Or are they a new category. "Instantly vintage?"
This is off the record
kcole4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:07 pm

Post by kcole4001 »

Now I can't belong to the modern era 'til I get a new Rick! (joking)
Image
Plus five minus five!
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

A new excuse to buy another one.
This is off the record
kcole4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:07 pm

Post by kcole4001 »

I don't need an excuse, just the money!
Plus five minus five!
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

I thought 79 was a good cutoff point, 4003's were started in 1980 and a period of flux in their products started around that time also. 72-73 was also another big transition phase.
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

Don't worry guys, I bought my first new Rickenbacker in 1979, so I have a hard time thinking it's a vintage piece! LOL...
User avatar
tony_carey
Advanced Member
Posts: 2055
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by tony_carey »

This is great, because although my first Ric was a brand new 4001JG in '78, my oldest gtr now is a 360WB FG from '84.

'84 was the last year of X bracing?
'Rickenbacker'...what a name! After all these years, it still thrills me.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Transition Years - 1973 to 1983”