I agree with consistency issues, but that goes for virtually any/all brands too. Lots of people complain about things like fret sprout, bad setups, etc., but those things are easily fixed. Guess I've lucked out the few times I've bought something online, in that those guitars (Les Paul Standard and the aforementioned LE Strat) were dang near perfect out of the box. They were brand new too. I just set them up the way I like them myself - it was no big deal. But I've got friends who *expect* any and all guitars they buy to be exactly perfect for *them* when they open the box (if mailordered) or pull it off the wall in a shop. To me, that's a completely unrealistic expectation.
For example, a few years ago I was in a San Diego shop playing one of those cheap-o Gibson Faded LP Specials. Looked it over - no flaws, intonation was perfect, played a few chords and lead lines and it sounded fantastic to me. Asked a friend to play it while I stood away from the amp so I could get a better idea of what it sounded like at a distance.
When he was finished, he said I was nuts to buy any guitar that had fret sprout on it - even the slight amount this one had. He said something about sloppy workmanship and horrible quality control.
So I just asked him what he thought of the sound, and he thought it sounded great. Then I asked him what he thought about the price ($500 out the door at that time). Great sound for that price he said. So I bought it (I was going to anyway, no matter what he said). After that I asked him about the "quality" rant he gave me and I simply said "Do you think ten minutes with a file on the ends of these frets was going to stop me from owning this great sounding guitar?"
It didn't even take 10 minutes to fix. He's still kicking himself for not buying one then. Nowadays those cost around $150 more...
Just saying that a lot of so-called flaws aren't worth worrying about at all.
As for the Fender neck finishes, most of them are the satin finishes - that's not necessarily a difference between the MIM and MIA models. Same goes for fretboard radii too. Just depends on the guitar model - and it seems like there's a million of 'em these days.
I like both types of finishes, and radius differences don't bother me at all. Back in the old days if you played any Fender you got a 7.25" radius and a glossy neck. No choice.
Now, my AM LE Strat, one MIM Strat and the Tele have a 9.5" radius board. The LE has a rosewood board and the others are all maple. All of those have the satin finish. But guess what? They've all gone glossy just from playing them a lot. Feels real nice!
My other Strat has a '50's all maple neck on it (7.25" radius) and it came with a gloss finish, and it's just as comfortable to me as the rest are now.
What cracks me up now is how we've got all the options to choose from and still some players declare stuff like "It's IMPOSSIBLE to bend strings on a 7.25 radius neck" and stuff like that... Well, to them I always say there was once this guy named Jimi who didn't seem to do too badly...
