"The Beatles are flippin lousy"

The history and music of the Fab Four
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

The Who and the Beatles are probably the two bands in rock history that had the best senses of humor.
This is off the record
User avatar
webhead
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1120
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2001 11:11 pm

Post by webhead »

Now guys, let's not forget the comic stylings of Davey Jones, Peter Tork, Mike Nesmith, and Mickey Dolenz....
"Take the RIC... Leave the cannoli."
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Post by jwilli »

Randy, I watched it again. You are correct. Boy, Pete was an idiot, lol.
randyz
Advanced Member
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 6:39 am

Post by randyz »

John: I don't think Pete was ever an idiot (besides adopting a personal guru). I think he wanted to say something outrageous and newsworthy. The Who were always doing whatever it took to be sensational. I forgive him for slagging the MopTops!
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

Just young Turk braggadocio, methinks. There was a lot worse slagging off-mike, I'm sure.
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

The best thing about this clip isn't the quote about the fabs, it's the quote about quality.

Another such quote, in the kids are alright, about the "geezers" in the crowd who only react when you make your guitar go "aaarrrrrwwwwhhh," is nearly as good and so true of rock shows.

>>I think he wanted to say something outrageous and newsworthy.<<

You bet it was calculated and it took guts to say it, as it could have backfired (funny how, to this day the Stones are thought of as the bad boys of the 60s, all for Jagger wearing a sweatshirt on Ed Sullivan. What a rebel. The Who made the Stones look like choirboys.)

Long before punk, Kiss, Alice Cooper/Glam and a ton of other acts that weren't half as talented as the Who, Pete and Co. had sensationalism and a bag of tricks that was deep and D.I.Y. (i.e. other than the occasional smoke bomb set off by a stagehand, in the early days they did it all by themselves.) And it wasn't because they were idiots.

At one point Lennon talked about how he felt the Fabs sold out/were constrained once Brian came on the scene, and that all their outrageousness was left behind in Hamburg.

The Who were constrained by no one (of course, Keith should have been restrained.) At times Lennon must have envied them.
This is off the record
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

>>Now guys, let's not forget the comic stylings of Davey Jones, Peter Tork, Mike Nesmith, and Mickey Dolenz....<<

So true. But were they comics first and a band second?

By the way, the classic clip of Zappa and Nesmith was on Youtube but it's been taken down. A lot of stuff on their is disappearing (Tom Petty has vanished.) Lawyers are afoot?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MXIR29KE20&search=the%20monkees
This is off the record
User avatar
brammy
Senior Member
Posts: 5074
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 5:00 am

Post by brammy »

Whats really scarey on that link is the clip of the 3 Monkees doing 'I'm a Believer".... Mike Nesmith had the right instincts to steer clear of those silly performances.
“The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it.” ....H. L. Mencken
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

Hmmm....worst Monkees clip I've seen is a 70s variety show appearance by Dolenz and Jones with Boyce and Hart, leisure suits and all. Ugh. Amazing they'd regroup and be a hot draw in the mid 80s...guess that shows how bad the 80s were.
This is off the record
User avatar
12stringbassist
Intermediate Member
Posts: 579
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 7:44 am
Contact:

Post by 12stringbassist »

Pete actually said that the backing tracks were lousy.

Very often, if you heard an earlier period Beatles song with the vocals off, the backing tracks DID sound unexpectedly scrappy sometimes (something to do with the speed they recorded those early albums at, due to little studio time being available to them between gigs and films, etc) though they still generally worked beautifully as a whole.

Their later work doesn't attract such criticism because they made far superior backing tracks later on.
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

And of course there is the rumor that they never told Ringo what song they were gonna play.
This is off the record
randyz
Advanced Member
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 6:39 am

Post by randyz »

If Pete thought that The Beatles' backing tracks were bad, what about The Who's? In my opinion, The Who's early work was very poorly performed and recorded. As a Who fan, I appreciate Pete's songwriting, but when he slagged the Fabs, The Who weren't a great studio band (yet).
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

As per poor quality tracking in the mid 60s, there's a thread in the Byrds folder called "massive bass clunker" that documents the unpolished nature of recordings of that era. It brings to mind the Rutles' joke "their first album took 20 minutes to record. Their second...even longer!" Otherwise, the consensus here has been that Pete was less slagging the fabs than engaging a brilliant kind of verbal vandalism positioning strategy (and having to use the world's #1 band to do so) for his own band and adding it to the Who's art-as-destruction live act (which could only reach those in the theater or club vs. all those watching on TV.) His whole knocking quality anti-pop diatribe was clearly a page the Sex Pistols swiped and followed to a T 11 or so years later, to great success. It's kind of funny how, by swearing in interviews and knocking the queen in song the Pistols were initially a lot more successful than early era Who when their act in the 70s, compared to the Who's in the mid 60s, was if not less outrageous (after guys dressing in drag in the early 70s) was certainly less dangerous (Pete had his eardrum nearly blown out in 67) and less expensive (as they weren't trashing all that gear every gig.)
This is off the record
User avatar
expomick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 574
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 12:40 pm
Contact:

Post by expomick »

Good comparison!
How much!?!
randyz
Advanced Member
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 6:39 am

Post by randyz »

I was recently reading a detailed day-by-day account of The Who's career during 1965-1967, and it was amazing how many gigs they missed or cancelled. Reminds me of The Kinks who were also notorious for their unreliable nature (and onstage fighting). They couldn't have endeared themselves to booking agents and venue owners with their unprofessional behavior. The Beatles and Brian Epstein, on the other hand, were by all accounts very professional.
Post Reply

Return to “Beatles' Forum”