4003 tailpiece bending up

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

4003 tailpiece bending up

Post by ojobob2 »

ok, heres my dilema, if you took part in the previous thread i started, you will know that i have this amazing white 91' 4003 - with a bent up tailpiece. While it affects nothing playability wise, i dont like the idea of my favorite bass guitar having a bent part on it.

You know how everyone has one instrument thats just perfect for them? well this white 4003 is mine. Im seriously thinking of ordering a new tailpiece to correct my problem, but in another ten years time, will that one warp too?

I know some of you suggested adding extra screws to the back of the tailpiece, but i dont wanna drill into my prized possession

i hope someone can advise me
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Owen:
With all due respect, this whole 'bent up tailpiece' subject is downright absurd. There's nothing wrong with the tailpiece on your 4003. Don't waste money on a new unit therefor. Don't add extra screws to it, either. Just leave it alone.
I wish John Hall would comment on this.
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

If you add the 2 screws with good craftsmanship then it will look like it came from the factory that way ....

I have found that pretty much most of the ric's that I have owned from 1970's to present will either bend up a little or a lot ... I used to replace the tailpiece but now I just add screws ...

The only ones that stay down completely flat are the ones from the 60's ...
ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

You know what, your all right, i will leave it be.Image
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
User avatar
banta
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 5:00 am

Post by banta »

I've never had that problem with any of the Ric basses I've owned, but the two I have now both have the 'extra' two screws in the tailpiece, so I don't see any way that they could bend.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

Jeff, thanks for the link, but i have decided to leave the bass as is - in any case i would need a black bridgeImage, but thanks anyway
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
jeff_ulmer
Intermediate Member
Posts: 873
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jeff_ulmer »

I would disagree that there's nothing wrong with a bent up tailpiece. If the shape of the metal has changed over time it is from stress, and there is no telling if it will fail completely at some point. If this is a black hardwared bass, I would be buying a spare just in case.
ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

im getting worried now. $110 is a lot of money for a spare
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

Get a new one and put it on and save the old one as a backup .... if the new one pulls up over time then drill holes in the old one and use it ..
gt76
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2000 7:18 pm

Post by gt76 »

Since the "C" series is supposedly an exact (exact as possible anyway less the truss rods) duplicate of a famous 60's era bass, is the bridge plate a pot metal replica or is it the same material (?) as the plate in the 60's. This was a non-issue until the 70's so if the "C"s bridge plate is a duplication, problem solved. I'm guessing that we'll see the plate curl on the "C"s in the next couple of years.
ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

theres a 4001 CS on ebay:http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2523546337&category=4713

The tailpiece is lifting, and while not as bad as mine, it would seem that the majority of rick basses do this.

Its almost as if the slightly bent up shape is the "natural" shape that the tailpiece bends into, and is quite normal
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15138
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

For purposes of discussion after the auction is over, here is a portion of the photo from eBay.
Image
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

It bothers me more to see the tailpiece lifting up then to see 2 extra screws in the tailpiece.

I got used to seeing my 1968 laying absolutely flat for 30 years so whenever I see a tailpiece pulling up I get the urge to pop 2 screws in ...
ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

can inserting some screws really bend that metal back ? it looks pretty damn tough.

wouldnt it just dig into the wood
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”