String tension question

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
danbind
Junior Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 8:47 am

String tension question

Post by danbind »

For roundwound vs. compressed flat vs. flatwound, is there any "rule of thumb" on diameter vs. string tension? It seems intuitive that a roundwound diameter would be a little bigger than flatwound to achieve the same tension, if string mass is the only metric, but what do I know? I've been using compressed flats, but have been thinking of trying roundwounds, and would like to avoid any neck adjustments if I could help it.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15135
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

Dan: The tension depends on the gauge and the construction of the string. You will be able to use roundwound 10s on your Rickenbacker in place of the flats without a neck adjustment as long as the gauge is in the same ballpark. If you increase the gauge a truss rod adjustment is likely.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
danbind
Junior Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 8:47 am

Post by danbind »

Understood--but does the compression process actually reduce the diameter? I guess that is my real question. Thanks for the input!
danbind
Junior Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 8:47 am

Post by danbind »

For instance, a set of Rotosound Yellows have an 'A' that is .036 & low 'E' at .046. This might be the same tension-wise as a Rick compressed wound set with .034 & .042, respectively.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15135
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

The compression would decrease the diameter to some extent.

It is my understanding, at least in the case of compressed roundwounds, that the manufacturer takes a round wound set and passes them over a roller in the final stage of processing which compresses them and makes them smoother at the same time.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
User avatar
tony_carey
Advanced Member
Posts: 2055
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by tony_carey »

I think you are right Peter....smoother & more consistant in diameter. I remember a thread that I initiated & JH kindly posted, with words to the effect that Ric 10-42's were equivelant in tension to normal roundwound 10-46's....at least that was my understanding.
'Rickenbacker'...what a name! After all these years, it still thrills me.
danbind
Junior Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 8:47 am

Post by danbind »

Well that seems to hit the nail right on the head. Thanks!
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

I think the inner core upon which everything else is wrapped on has more to do with tension than anything else. You can't really go by gauge as some thicker strings have much less tension than some supposed thin "light" sets.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”