Dark Star 4004 coming to California!
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
OK. The DS Rick has been with me for a two or three days now. Here's my observations thus far.
So far I've only been able to practice on it and do an acousticy rehearsal. I have a gig Sunday that I'm going to use both it and my V63 on. I'm not good at describing tonal differences but after the gig I might be able to say something more intelligent about it. For now this is what I can say.
The Dark Star pickups are incredibly clean, strong, and accurate. They do a beautiful job of simply amplifying the natural sound of the instrument itself so the differences I'm hearing between the two basses is mainly the differences created by their different woods and assembly. Do you know what kind of wood the 4004 is? The V63, being a bit denser and heavier, has a bit more focused, tight sound. A bit more lows too. The 4004, being lighter seems to have a more open resonance AND great sustain. I'd say there are more high mids in the 4004 and the lows are not quite as deep. The neck has a chunkier feel. I have not measured it but I think it is simply fatter. What a looker too. It's a sexy looking bass!
Both sound great to my ear. Can't say I prefer one tone over the other at this point. I'll probably bring my V63 on my UK tour (leaving Tues!!) as I know it better, but either would do well.
So far I've only been able to practice on it and do an acousticy rehearsal. I have a gig Sunday that I'm going to use both it and my V63 on. I'm not good at describing tonal differences but after the gig I might be able to say something more intelligent about it. For now this is what I can say.
The Dark Star pickups are incredibly clean, strong, and accurate. They do a beautiful job of simply amplifying the natural sound of the instrument itself so the differences I'm hearing between the two basses is mainly the differences created by their different woods and assembly. Do you know what kind of wood the 4004 is? The V63, being a bit denser and heavier, has a bit more focused, tight sound. A bit more lows too. The 4004, being lighter seems to have a more open resonance AND great sustain. I'd say there are more high mids in the 4004 and the lows are not quite as deep. The neck has a chunkier feel. I have not measured it but I think it is simply fatter. What a looker too. It's a sexy looking bass!
Both sound great to my ear. Can't say I prefer one tone over the other at this point. I'll probably bring my V63 on my UK tour (leaving Tues!!) as I know it better, but either would do well.
- incubus2432
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4174
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 11:26 am
- incubus2432
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4174
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 11:26 am
well, maybe not, BUT they are expensive pickups so I would think they would hold their value. It's not like throwing Duncans into a Rick. They really do work well with the guitar and look vintage so they compliment the overall look of the bass. They really work well with the all black 4004 because the pickups themselves are black and chrome.
Yeah, I'm sot sure they'd look great on my FG.
I've seen pics from Dude's board, it is a nice job on the install.
I'm just loathe to mod a Rick. Although I am thinking seriously about putting dual concentric pots on the Laredo. I'm pretty sure I understand the wiring and can do it.
I've seen pics from Dude's board, it is a nice job on the install. I'm just loathe to mod a Rick. Although I am thinking seriously about putting dual concentric pots on the Laredo. I'm pretty sure I understand the wiring and can do it.
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
