1993 4003S FG or 1998 4001v63 MG?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
fran4001
Intermediate Member
Posts: 878
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 2:25 pm
Contact:

Post by fran4001 »

John, welcome! You are going to absolutely love this place! My take on your dilemma, get the V63 first. If it doesn't do the trick, try the "vintage switch" mod from the new 4003, which John Hall describes himself over at the RIC website board. It just adds the old .0047 cap into the bridge pickup circuit, supposedly giving you more clank (or less bass!). If that still doesn't do it, throw some high gains in it! All easy stuff, and relatively affordable. Or, buy both!
Apr. '73 4001JG, Jun. '73 4001MG, Feb. '75 4001 WBT, Feb. '00 4001CS
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

there can be only, "one"...
Image
Buy it before someone else does
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Post by teeder »

Welcome John,

I'd go with the V63!
Image
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
User avatar
philipharris
Member
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:16 am

Post by philipharris »

The S! The S!
enough, already.
User avatar
chefothefuture
Advanced Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am

Post by chefothefuture »

V63!
'68 4001MG, '70 4001 21Fret, '71 4001S MG, '71 4001FG, '72 4001AZ, '73 4001FG, '73 4001resto, '59 365FG, '96 381/12v69FG, '71 4001 21Fret FG
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

both!
Buy it before someone else does
User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Post by heinpete »

HEY! ON JEFFREY'S PIC OF CS WITH HIS RIC THERE IS CLEARLY NO TAILPIECE LIFT AT ALL!!!
"The youth of today should start thinking about the state in which they want to leave this planet to Keith Richards..."! Quote by an unknown musician
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

I wonder how many tailpieces Chris has gone through? Or if he is still on the origional? Maybe is we all had our own personal guitar tech......
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2790
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Post by henry5 »

Quote -"I have a V63 and have played 4001CSs. Except for cosmetic changes and the Certificate, the two are identical".

i know lots of people who seem to have experienced that but I've owned 2 CSs and 1 V63 and have played several more V63s, and in my experience they sound very different. To my ears the CSs sound quite a bit harder and less open, less "airy" for want of a better word.

After saying that a Rick-owning friend played my CS and V63 when I had them both and couldn't tell the difference, but to me they were like night and day.
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle."
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37515
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

The original tailpieces were a solid casting so those never have the lift problem; CS's is one of those. Some of the chrome is coming off it, however.

Image

Jared: " we ain't got no good platers around here, send it to Cleveland."
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

like he said...
Buy it before someone else does
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”