4003S neck relief (caution

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
alansan
New member
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 4:25 am

4003S neck relief (caution

Post by alansan »

Hi,
my question is about the difference in the amount of relief on each side of the neck on my new 1986 4003S. I have it set-up like this: 0.5mm on the treble side of the neck and 1mm on the bass side.

I've always found that the E and A strings benefit from slightly more room to vibrate.

Is there any risk of twisting/bowing by having different amounts of relief on each side of the neck?
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

No, that is the reason for having two truss rods in the first place. Different relief on each side on an otherwise perfectly straight neck is twist. The dual rod system is designed to apply a small amount of twisting force (torque) to the neck.
alansan
New member
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 4:25 am

Post by alansan »

Thanks that's put my mind at rest.
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

twist & shout!
Buy it before someone else does
alansan
New member
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 4:25 am

Post by alansan »

Ouch. The word play around here is excruciating sometimes;)
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Post by johnhall »

For the record, we suggest our instruments be set up with no relief at all, a dead straight neck. Then introduce relief only as needed to reduce the buzzing the the level you're willing to accept. Going by a straight measurement rarely results in a satisfactory set-up as there's just too many factors involved, i.e. string type, playing style, and basic personal preference.

That being said, your action is quite low, because 2.4 mm on the bass side and 1.6 mm on the treble side is more normal.
alansan
New member
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 4:25 am

Post by alansan »

Thanks for the advice Mr. Hall.

If it wasn't for a slightly worn third fret present when I recently acquired the bass I would indeed be setting the neck totally flat. Until I get the frets dressed this still allows me low action without buzz.
User avatar
bigbajo60
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 912
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 8:15 pm

Post by bigbajo60 »

...2.4 mm on the bass side and 1.6 mm on the treble side is more normal.


While I realize that these numbers are meant to be a ballpark starting point, there is something that I've always wondered; is this measurement taken at the 12th fret while fretting at the first fret (as I've seen some other manufacturers and many luthiers recommend...), or with the string "open" to the nut (or in my case, zero fret)?
My first bass was a Rickenbacker...
My best bass is a Rickenbacker...
My last bass may very well be a Rickenbacker
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12659
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

IIRC, it is taken while fretting at the first fret (I usually capo at the first fret when checking relief).
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”