Rewired like Jazz Bass?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

sornord
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun May 06, 2001 7:16 pm

Rewired like Jazz Bass?

Post by sornord »

I'm shopping for a Cheyenne as a graduation gift for my son. Seeing several Internet items where this bass (or other Ricks?) were rewired like a Jazz Bass. What's this all about?
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

some of us 4004 owners feel the 4004 bass sounds better with a volume, volume, tone arrangement rather than a toggle volume tone arrangement ... the whole idea is that you can now blend the pickups ...
zoomduck
Member
Posts: 445
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:07 pm

Post by zoomduck »

I installed concentric pots on my 4004 for more tone control . I used the wiring diagram from an early 60s stacknob ( concentric ) Fender Jazz bass because that illustration was simpler for me to understand . Both versions work great .
More throttle...Less brakes
zoomduck
Member
Posts: 445
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:07 pm

Post by zoomduck »

Hey !!! I'm now a Senior member !
More throttle...Less brakes
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

Nice graduation gift! Mine is concentric (V/T, V/T, and switch) like Barry's. Benefit there over the VVT is tone control on both pups. Congrats to the grad, too.
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6261
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

VVT or concentric VT/VT just gives you alot more flexability and control. The stock, "neck pickup", "bridge pickup" or "both" pickups is OK,,,but it kept me thinking hmmmm,,,,,"I wonder what this bass would sound like with just a little neck pickup rolled off"?

I drove me crazy until I went with the concentric setup. I think the "jazz type" VVT would be just as good though.
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

In practice I haven't found individual tone controls of much use unless the bass is running in stereo mode, hence the VVT setup is just fine.
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

Personally I find the stock 4004 wiring fine. I agree that more flexibility is nice, but for my style rolling off the tone and switching pu's is enough.

I'm sort of intrigued by the concentrics however. But it really isn't a pressing issue for me. Image

------------

Question for you guys with concentrics: do you have it wired so the pu selector switch still works?
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6261
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

I dont. I removed the original pots and switch as to not disturb the solder joints, and installed the concentric' pots with a dummy selector switch.
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
bobcat
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:54 pm

Post by bobcat »

If I were to ever get a Laredo, I would probably go for concentric pots and keep the switch, so that the setup would be pretty much the same as a 4003 . . . I love those controls.
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

Bobcat, that's what I'd try to do if I were to make the change. I figure that using the wiring diagram from a 4001 up to the switch, and then following the 62 RI J Bass (which shows how to handle the 6 pins of the concentric pots) *should* do the job.

But I'd rather hear from someone who has actually tried that first... Image

Frankly I see the switch as semi-useless in that situation - if I were to design the 650 Dakota that I have I'd have skipped the switch, and the switch in my 4001 has given me more hassle than usefulness, but the switches are there and I'd rather if it were there that it be of use.

Just in case I wanted to use it...
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
User avatar
markbass99
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1267
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 7:23 am

Post by markbass99 »

I agree with Jeff about the individual tone control, I haven't seen the need to change the tone on each pup separately and it keeps things simple. As seen in this picture, I pretty much play with these controls dimed out, love the VVT setup.
Image
73 Feb 4001, 73 March 4001, 73 April 4001, 73 May 4001, 73 June 4001, 73 July 4001
04 MM Bongo 5HSp, 07 MM Bongo 5HS, 09 MM Bongo 5HS, 09 MM Bongo 5Hp, 11 MM Bongo 5H
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

the VVT setup has classic simplicity and great functionality ...

I find the toggle volume tone setup works better for guitar that bass ... but I am sure many guitarists will disagree with me ...
green_us90
Intermediate Member
Posts: 530
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 12:23 pm

Post by green_us90 »

My Frickenbird project bass is wired VVT also, it works the best for me. Considered stack knobs but went VVT.
Gitch-Pang, Gitch-Pang- the RIC trademark
zoomduck
Member
Posts: 445
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:07 pm

Post by zoomduck »

With concentrics I just do'nt need the 3 way switch .
More throttle...Less brakes
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”