Fixing a slight neck twist in a 4004 Ci?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Fixing a slight neck twist in a 4004 Ci?

Post by edski »

I have a lead on what looks like a decent looking 4004 Ci. There is a neck twist...



From the description I think the guy doesn't know what to do, and it seems that the neck/headstock junction is fine. It looks like a simple truss adjustment?

Image

Would like opinions. I think I'm pulling the trigger on this...which would likely make me part with my 75 4001...

Thanks!
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

Twists like that are not always problematic. Many instruments with twists live normal and productive lives. The slope of the nut seems to be amplifying the illusion so it may not be as bad as all that. It is entirely possible that the twist is caused by a broken or non-working rod and that only one rod (the G side) is carrying the neck load. That is just a guess. I don't like to diagnose problems without being able to put my hands on the instrument but this one is likely to be fixable.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Post by rickenbrother »

Like Ted said, the slope of the nut makes it look like the neck has a twist or can make the twist look worse than it actually is. Judge by how parallel the frets are to each other as you look down from the top of the fingerboard.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

Thanks for the replies...I seem to not have been quick enough. Image
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
User avatar
simer4001
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 8:14 pm

Post by simer4001 »

Now...what about that 75 4001?
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6261
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

When I get a different Rick bass, one of the first things I do is remove the old strings, relax both rods, then tighten them gradually but evenly when I install the new strings.

That way if a neck issue develops, at least I have a good reference point to start with. Sometimes I'll even write down the individual adjustments I've made.

Although I've never really had many neck problems with my Ricks. The 2 rod concept is definatley the way to go.
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

Now...what about that 75 4001?


It's just that I don't play the thing anymore (since I got my Laredo) and it's not like me to hoard such a nice instrument. It should be played. Image There's still A LOT of life left on that 4001, but I use my fretless J as a back up...and basically play ALL the time with my Laredo.

And I like the 4004 better. I have a Dakota, and LOVE the Ci finish, and if that were my "other" Rick bass it'd be my backup, and I'd actually play it. The fretless would stay at home as a practice/specialty instrument, and I'd probably play a slightly worn Ci more than my very nice condition FG 4004L...I might keep the 2004 FG at home to keep it pristine (or nearly so Image )

But right now I feel like the 4001 is
1) not being used right
2) it might not be the right bass for me anymore...

I've been confused about this 4001 now for a while, and the confusion doesn't seem to go away. If I get a chance at th 4004 Ci again I might take it and THEN sell the 4001. When I told my wife that I've probably missed getting the Ci this was the exchange:

Me: "I shoulda pm'd the guy last night!"

Her: "Probably a reason why you didn't"

Yeah, the reason is probably hesitated is my confusion over how I feel about this 4001...
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
jmh
Member
Posts: 285
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 8:57 pm

Post by jmh »

Confusion will be my epitaph.
If it ain't broke, break it, then fix it.
scottpro1969
Intermediate Member
Posts: 687
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 9:19 am

Post by scottpro1969 »

Ed, I saw that one too. $575 is a steal for that, which is what I think he wants. I'd pull the trigger quick. Wish I had the extra $$.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

That is a great price for that bass even if the twist is real. It is perfectly repairable.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

it looks more like a slanted nut than a twisted neck ... ric nuts are usually cut high ... one way to fix it is toe cut the grooves deeper ... another way it to sand the bottom of the nut like the one pictured ... or a little of both ...
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Post by rickenbrother »

Ed, I saw that one too. $575 is a steal for that, which is what I think he wants. I'd pull the trigger quick. Wish I had the extra $$.


If I found that bass at that price, I wouldn't hesitate for a second to get it.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

Well, I hesitated for about 12 hours and lost it.

Image

Thing that gets me is the guy he sold it to was making him wait for 3 days while they buyers eBay auction closed...I told the dude I'd have paid for it now and worried about my own auction afterwards...

Oh well, Brian Crisman told me privately that he's had dealings with this guy and he was sort of a flake...might be a good thing that I missed out on it.

I am real close, *really, really close*, to offering my 75 4001 up for a trade for a 4004 Ci...I think it's reasonable trade as far as equity of the instruments, and I think the 4001 is better off with someone who wants it. Image

I feel guilty giving up on it, after all these years...

***********

Edit - Brian just told me that this seller was NOT the same guy that flaked on him. Image Sorry!
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

Ed, the 4004Ci is a really great bass. Mine had a slight twist like that in the neck when I got it and it took two sessions with a truss rod wrench to get it straight. Both were small adjustments, but the neck did straighten out. It wasn't quite as much as that pic showed, but the others also pointed out correctly that a lot of it was the angle of the nut on top and also the camera angle. You really need to hold it so you compare where the nut meets the headstock wood to the top flat of the body, then it wouldn't have looked as bad. My advice is next opportunity you have to get one (jeez, that was a fantastic price!) is to grab it and if it isn't your cup of tea you can always find a buyer here on the forum easily. I really like the tone of the bass, and also the body contours for the plucking arm. Oh, great neck profile too. F W I W
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

my 4004ci 4-2-5 is a really nice bass ... it is so nice that I don't like to take it out of the house ... it has a nice warm mid growl to it ...
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”