Sleeper on the bay

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Sleeper on the bay

Post by bassduke49 »

This one was originally described as a 4003S Midnight Blue, but it's actually a set-neck 4001S in Azureglo. Odd replacement Grover tuners, but not in bad shape otherwise. It's not getting much action, probably because of the inaccurate description, and ends soon:

http://cgi.ebay.com/1983-Rickenbacker-4003S-Bass-Guitar_W0QQitemZ140025121967QQihZ004QQcategoryZ4713QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

Mmmmmm. S!
Play what you love, love what you play!
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Post by teeder »

Saw that earlier this morning.
Very nice!
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
User avatar
ricosound
Intermediate Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 11:36 am

Post by ricosound »

SO for the fun of it, nobody be a smarty pants and correct him. This is how the deals can be had. He's not being dishonest, just not as well informed. It'd be nice for this to go under a grand, which is more what these things are worth.
No matter where you go - there you are.
xakattack
Junior Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 4:17 pm

Post by xakattack »

i'd like to have a 's' series but i'm just not a fan of blueish colors.

good luck guys!
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

I already have blown it, it's an 82 4001S. I've e-mailed him back and forth several times, he believed me but wanted proof so I sent him links to Ric Int. It's actually less than an hour away, wish I had some cash right now.
zoomduck
Member
Posts: 445
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:07 pm

Post by zoomduck »

Well...I've wanted an S ever since I learned they have no binding....but I did'nt bid cause I thought it was a 4003.....Then I read here it is a 4001......it will probably shoot right off the price chart....I am happy with the RICs I already have.....I am happy with the RICs I already have......I am h......................
More throttle...Less brakes
User avatar
ricosound
Intermediate Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 11:36 am

Post by ricosound »

I agree we should police dishonest/illegal auctions. However, honest and poorly listed auctions can lead to good deals. There was no point in correcting this one just to run the price up. I have no obligation to maximize the profit for a seller. Our knowledge gained here is our advantage. However, it's we collectors that are killing the prices for all.
No matter where you go - there you are.
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

I didn't do it to drive up the price, I did it because I felt bad for the guy who obviously had no idea what it was. Besides he's a fellow Massachusite. (I made that up but feel free to use it anytime). I also didn't realize that it was being discussed on this site until after I had contacted him several times. I regularly help people on ebay with basses and also antique radios unless of course I'm bidding, haha!
I also do the opposite and try to correct misrepresentations (attempted rip offs) which happen much more frequently than innocent mistakes like this. I think to myself, would I like someone to help me if I were selling something and had the item wrong and would stand to maybe lose a lot of money through my own ignorance? Yes, I would love the help.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

I personally don't see how the mis-labelling the auction should lead to much of a price difference in the first place. I've tracked the values of 4003S and 4001S models, and haven't seen much difference.

I could see if it were a V63 mis-labeled as a 4003 or 4003S.

Yes, the set neck 4001S's are a few years older, but the 4003S's have the neck-through construction, better tuners, better truss rods and many have the 7-screw tailpiece that won't lift.
Play what you love, love what you play!
User avatar
rikk
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 3:04 pm

Post by rikk »

I was more interested when I thought it might really be a 4003.
zoomduck
Member
Posts: 445
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:07 pm

Post by zoomduck »

OK ....so how diferent does a 4003S sound from a 4001S ?
More throttle...Less brakes
User avatar
ricosound
Intermediate Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 11:36 am

Post by ricosound »

Let's make a promise. The next V63 that is listed as a 4003 or 'Rickenbacher Bass', I say let the fool alone so we may all benefit!
No matter where you go - there you are.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

Well Barry...The 4003S was made from 1980 until 1996 or so, and it's sound changed some over the years. The first ones had the cap in the circuit. At some point in the mid '80's the cap was dropped.

I don't have a 4001S from the 70's to compare to my 4003S's, but I do have deluxe 4001's from the 70's to compare. I'd say that the mid-80's 4003S sounds very similar to an un-capped 70's 4001.

Starting in around 1990 or so, the pickups changed to the modern ones. I think these newer 4003's sound a little more growly; a little more dark.
Play what you love, love what you play!
just_bassics
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1244
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:12 am

Post by just_bassics »

It's official, it went to a forumite!
You can never own too many guitars!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”