Thin neck years ??

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

kidvett
New member
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 1:49 pm

Thin neck years ??

Post by kidvett »

Hello all,

I am using a 4003 ( 2006 ) I bought new a few months back. A very fine bass except...for the neck !! It's a thick one and I'm having a hard time...( I have normal size hands )

I know some 4001 were made with thin necks. I'd like to know which years have those thin necks ?? A friend suggested 75 to 83...Is he right ?? I'm asking because I may have a call on a 1975 4001....Also, were there any 4003 made with a thin neck or they are all the same as the one I have ??

I hope you guys can help me so I can have a better idea on this issue and start to look for a ``thinner one`` as it's sometimes a pain to play with my 4003...

Thanks for the help

Marc
User avatar
thinneckrick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:59 am
Contact:

Post by thinneckrick »

Marc, That issue has been addressed many times here . It is hard to say in my opinion .i have had many ricks lots of different years and they were all different . I have had a couple of 86's that were thin a 99 , an 81 . I think it just happened to be whoever was shaving necks on that particular day . There are some forum members who have 60's ricks that are consistently thin . Since i've never owned one i could'nt tell . The new ones starting in june are sporting a thinner neck profile . Alot compared to last years.They have a flatter feel to them and are alot easier play.There are still some new ones being shipped with last years profile. i have a new one with the thin neck profile and it has been a dream come true to me . Its the nicest 4003 i have ever owned . In fact , I ordered another one a week later . So sell the ball bat and call Mike Parks at the rickenbacker page He'll set you right up.
im getting to old for this ****
User avatar
ben_brown
Advanced Member
Posts: 2503
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:00 am

Post by ben_brown »

I have played both a 73 and a 74 4001 and both are thin and flat necks. I understand from a friend that his 76 also sports a thin flat neck as well. I just sold my brand new 2005 4003 because of the same reasons. However you can make that 4003 much easier to play if you file that high nut down some and lower the action accordingly.
'73 4001 MG '88 4003S JG '89 4003S FG '91 4003S MG
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

I still have to make the data available but the difference between a thin and thick neck turns out to be around only 1/32". The shape seems to be more of a factor than the actual thickness too. Necks will vary as they are hand sanded. For sure the thinnest necks you will find on any Rick bass will be from the 60's.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

yep the thin neck years were the 60s ... and 70-72 ... the problem is the necks were so thin they sometimes had structural failure ...
User avatar
atomic_punk
Senior Member
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by atomic_punk »

Allgedly, of course...Image
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

If the number of surviving examples is any indication, there was plenty of that back then. The old one are pretty fragile.
bmwone
New member
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:33 pm

Post by bmwone »

My '71 (stolen summer 05 - RIP) had a super thin neck, no structural problems. I loved it. Just got a one-owner 73 JG, very similar!
User avatar
markbass99
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1267
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 7:23 am

Post by markbass99 »

Hey Matt, I forgot to ask you if you're running the cap on that 73 or did you bypass it. I'm currently playing two 73's bypassed and one with the cap.(The dark burgundy in the middle)
Image
73 Feb 4001, 73 March 4001, 73 April 4001, 73 May 4001, 73 June 4001, 73 July 4001
04 MM Bongo 5HSp, 07 MM Bongo 5HS, 09 MM Bongo 5HS, 09 MM Bongo 5Hp, 11 MM Bongo 5H
squirefan01
Intermediate Member
Posts: 966
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:00 am

Post by squirefan01 »

I've always thought that my '87 4003 has a thin neck, and when I got it (from Charly G) I heard that the years around '87 had thinner necks. It plays great for me but I do have XL hands (would have loved to get the chance to compare them to Squire's!).

I can't wait to compare to my new 75th 4003!
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

the 60s thin necks had an upside ... they resonate better ... and of course they feel good in your left hand ...
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

Greg, I too thought I had pretty big hands. My right is 8 3/8" from the joint line where it meets the arm to the tip of my middle finger. Chris's was about 9", guessing from the brief time we compared.
alanz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:58 pm
Contact:

Post by alanz »

My 77 SnotGLo 4001 has a great thin neck. The '85-'05 BronzeGlo Abomination has a neck more like a baseball bat, but still playable.
Listen to that sustain!
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

I have small hands and the "chunky" neck on my Laredo actually feels good...

My 75 has a fairly thin feel to it. I like them all! Image
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
squirefan01
Intermediate Member
Posts: 966
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:00 am

Post by squirefan01 »

8 3/8" here too John. That Chris is a monster!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”