Newbie Tone Control Question

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

alanz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:58 pm
Contact:

Post by alanz »

OK, so put in a .0012 uF cap (or whatever's closest) to compensate for the modern hi gain value and thereby get roughly the same RC value in the circuit.
Listen to that sustain!
User avatar
ben_brown
Advanced Member
Posts: 2503
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:00 am

Post by ben_brown »

You mean "tone pot" right?
'73 4001 MG '88 4003S JG '89 4003S FG '91 4003S MG
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

Man, I gotta measure my 2004 4003 when I get home...
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

yep ... thanks ... I fixed the post ...

so if you want your 4003 to sound like a 4001 ... 8k ohm pickups, 500k ohm tone pots, and a .0047 bass cut capacitor will get it most of the way there ...

or crank the treble on your amp ...
ziggydude
New member
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:44 am

Post by ziggydude »

OK - I know I need study all that. But to as they say "To Cut To The Quick" are you saying that the 4001 had a thinner sound than the 4003? That may be the start of what this is all about.

And yet - no comments on distance from P-U to string.

I will say this - you guys know your stuff.

- Ziggy -
I gig - so therefore I am.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

"And yet - no comments on distance from P-U to string."

Very good point! This plays into output and tone also.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

On most of my basses I like to get my pickups fairly close to the strings ... especially my Rickenbackers ... for me it just sounds better ...

yes the old ricks were more trebly sounding ... the old bass amps has less head room and the bass would often overpower the treble and the bass would sound muddy ... an old bass amp may have been 50 watts ... now days a good bass amp has 5 to 10 times that power and it has better cabinets and then we have better pa systems ... so we can get pretty much any frequency we want out of most basses ...

the old Rics were a good match for the old bass amps ... I think with a modern amp the 4003 is a better instrument ... but there are purists who prefer the vintage ...

I know a little bit about this stuff ... some of it I learned here, some from mistakes I made on my own basses, and some from other sources ...
madscotsman
New member
Posts: 89
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by madscotsman »

Has anyone here tried taking the bridge pickup from a 70's 4001 and put it in a new modern standard 4003? (Pre-push pull tone option) It has the bite and tone of the vintage 70's, and high-output bass can be dialed in on top with the modern neck hi-gain. I did not add a cap though, as I feel it did not need it. I have also added a push-pull kit to my other Rick and it does get the right vintage tone. I think the new changes I've seen to the 4000 basses are really cool and a big plus! No more music stores in my area that sell Ricks (or that stay in business--internet sales & ebay I guess?) so I will probably never see one in the flesh to test drive, but the new 4003's do look nice.
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Post by rickfan63 »

I've owned a 70's 4001, and now I own a 4003, a C64 and a V63. As far as I'm concerned, you can get that famous Rick sound out of all three. I prefer mine de-capped though.(Great tone is in the ears of the beholder) But with the new tone circuit you can get just about any tone from a 4003. Rickenbacker basses for tone, looks, and just plain cool vibe, just can't be beat.
I recently went back to playing a Rickenbacker bass. Its like meeting an old friend again
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Post by ram »

Here, here. I second the motion!!!!
The only thing we can perceive are our perceptions - George Berkeley
User avatar
gothbin
Junior Member
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:00 am

Post by gothbin »

I never played or seen a 4001 so I cannot comment about that one, but I own a 2003 Ric 4003FG. With roundwound strings and my Sansamp Bassdriver it goes in the direction of the Yes sound. But He, I do not own the hands of Chris - so difference there will be.

Nowadays I use D'Addario flatwounds chromes to have a more mellow sound say a bit vintage....

Oh, and I have all controls on 10!
Beside owning 14 guitars and basses and my own homestudio, what do I want more?
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

a sans amp really brings out the Squire sound from a 4003/4001 bass ... but the negative of a sans amp is it doesn't have compression ...
User avatar
gothbin
Junior Member
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:00 am

Post by gothbin »

No it hasn't have compression... But my Eden amp, where the Sansamp is going in has a compressor for the input signal - so that solves my problem. For what I read here on the forum it is very rare to play Eden amps.... But they kick ***!!!
Beside owning 14 guitars and basses and my own homestudio, what do I want more?
User avatar
markbass99
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1267
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 7:23 am

Post by markbass99 »

I've been using a 320 watt Eden nemesis 2x12 combo with a sansamp rbi and a FMR RNC compressor in front and it sounds great and gets very loud.
73 Feb 4001, 73 March 4001, 73 April 4001, 73 May 4001, 73 June 4001, 73 July 4001
04 MM Bongo 5HSp, 07 MM Bongo 5HS, 09 MM Bongo 5HS, 09 MM Bongo 5Hp, 11 MM Bongo 5H
ziggydude
New member
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:44 am

Post by ziggydude »

What is the "Cap" thing - should I do that? What are the pros and cons?

Thanx,

- Ziggy -
I gig - so therefore I am.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”