McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?

Scastles · Post by **Scastles** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:26 am

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6062526.stm

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/d ... ge_id=1766

webhead · Post by **webhead** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:30 am

I really don't think he's the type to be violent.

simer4001 · Post by **simer4001** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:32 am

I just wish it will be over soon.

webhead · Post by **webhead** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:41 am

I think the judge will end up laughing at her and her allegations...

webhead · Post by **webhead** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:46 am

I read the thing about him "ordering" her to cook dinner.. Doesn't he have a personal chef?

325_fan · Post by **325_fan** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:19 am

There'll never be another Linda. Like me, Paul is destined to be a single dood. I've resigned myself to it after three failed marriages. The bottom line is; you can't keep a lot of women happy no matter what you do.

beefandbones · Post by **beefandbones** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:02 am

Whoa... Wait a minute! Paul's used illegal drugs???

wj350 · Post by **wj350** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:32 am

I do feel sorry for him...it seemed like he and Linda had a perfect marriage, just from what you would read, and then I was happy for him when it appeared he got a second chance. Not working out is one thing, but not working out in such a nasty, public way is something else...

Who knows how much of it is the attorneys posturing/antagonizing...I hope it works out as well as can be expected for him.

Hang in there Sir Paul!

Bill

wints · Post by **wints** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:40 pm

When I'm 64...

He should have listened to his kids. There was enough media speculation about her in the early days, from many different sources, which clearly showed she was an apparent pathological liar.

Very sad...and, very expensive.

congerz83 · Post by **congerz83** » Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:00 am

This is an outrage! She must know she's gonna get wiped out in the trial so she is grasping at straws. "Stumpy the Gold-digger"

britye · Post by **britye** » Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:27 am

Seems to me he must have fell for her hard, not having a pre-nup and all. Love was blind for him, too bad.

beefandbones · Post by **beefandbones** » Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:28 am

I can't believe she would marry Paul McCartney and then have the nerve to accuse him of smoking pot in the divorce papers. In order to use a behavior or action against a person in divorce proceedings, the behavior would have to be contrary to the person's character or past, or otherwise indicate 'false advertising.' I've never been married, or divorced, so maybe I'm wrong here. But still... seems like common sense. Didn't she read 'Many Years from Now,' which was published well before their marriage? I've read it like nine times, myself, and it's all spelled out there in black and white, even his current opinions on the subject of marijuana.

I just can't fathom why you would marry Paul McCartney if you were OK with that activity to start with. I mean, really. Some people...

studiotwosession · Post by **studiotwosession** » Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:55 pm

>>I just can't fathom why you would marry Paul McCartney if you were OK with that activity to start with.<<

Kinda like Jerry Hall complaining about Mick Jagger's womanizing years after she married him.

>>Didn't she read 'Many Years from Now,'<<

One must consider the fact that there are many, many people who, despite the fact that they can read, never do (ex-models are not known for being bookish.)

For a while this might make it easy to believe what you want to believe, at least until reality knocks down one's door, which might explain such irrational statements after the fact.

Otherwise, Paul's situation isn't that unusual. He's been divorced once. So was John, Ringo, George, Mick (twice) Rod (lost count) etc. etc.

congerz83 · Post by **congerz83** » Thu Oct 19, 2006 7:40 pm

Ethan, "Many Years From Now" was a great book. I can read it over and over. As far as Heather citing "drug use" is a bit strange. I'm not one to accuse anyone of anything but, recent photos show a skeleton-like Heather around London. Could she have her own chemical means to cope with the divorce????

Hmmmm....... something to ponder.

brammy · Post by **brammy** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:49 am

Like I said... she doesn't have a leg to stand on.

The latest is that Heather supposedly haas some sort of audio or video tape showing that Paul "raised a hand" to her.

Wow.... this gold digger makes Anna Nichole Smith look like Mother Theresa.