Nice pics on this 69 4001

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

hmmm no pics .... no feedback .... no bids ...
User avatar
rikk
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 3:04 pm

Post by rikk »

Some people will never learn.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37515
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

This is the auction with the transparentglo bass that is being 'disgust' in the For Sale section.
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

He has added some obscure cell phone camera pics.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

It is clearly not a '69 as it has a skunk stripe.
maplered
Member
Posts: 246
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 5:00 am

Post by maplered »

If its a real ric, it looks like a 74 - 75 4001 not an S. Geez, do some research before you put something like that up for $7500.
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

"Geez, do some research"

Sometimes it works. This set-neck S model was listed as a "Rare 4001 v63 1963 Reissue!" and was BIN'ed within minutes at $1,500. Still a good deal, as it has a horseshoe and toaster.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
henny
Advanced Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:35 pm

Post by henny »

I pre-judged the set neck models of 4000/S basses, I figured the quintessential force behind any 4000-series' tone lies predominantly in the neck-through construction.

However, just this week, I've come across a 1972 FG 4000 with a set neck. It's delightful. The sound it makes is pure delight. And I didn't miss the bass pickup, either! Loved it.
User avatar
bob_atherton
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:47 am

Post by bob_atherton »

Henny, If you are going to pass on the 4000 please let me know. Down here in Bristol an old Ric is a very rare sight.Thanks, Bob
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2790
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Post by henry5 »

Henny, no shame in that, I did exactly the same before playing (and subsequently buying) my 73 4000. I'll never forget taking my 72 4001 in to try alongside it, and in terms of power the 4000 blew the doors off it. I did find later that my 4001s treble pickup was dying, but still, even replaced with one of Sergio's the 4000 happily keeps up with it. I prefer my 4000 to any post-72 4001 I've ever played. I'm currently looking after my old 76 4001 azure for its owner, and despite the cap mod, my 4000 sounds much better to my ears, and is if anything more powerful.
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle."
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

I nearly bought this a couple of weeks ago, but picked up a 73 instead. Looked very nice for the price...

http://cgi.ebay.com/1976-Rickenbacker-4000-Bass-Excellent-Condition_W0QQitemZ190042656410QQihZ009QQcategoryZ41439QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item190042656410
User avatar
henny
Advanced Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:35 pm

Post by henny »

The one I have near me is definitely a '72, identical in build to that one above, except it's got Grovers and the two holes where the thumbrest once was.

De-lightful bass. If anybody wants in, I'll put you through to the right people.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”