2 Extra Screws

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

Barry the 1st 4 string picture is a stock 4003 early 80s 4003 tailpiece ... the 2nd was my old 1968 4001 before I sold it ...
User avatar
congerz83
Intermediate Member
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:14 am

Post by congerz83 »

I will be looking forward to the pics, David.
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

I had some tailpiece lift on my c64. It was getting worse rather quickly until I yanked off the Pyramids. I put on some Chromes and it stopped moving.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by aceonbass »

Once the part of the tailpiece casting with the holes where the strings pass through at the rear leaves the deck, it is no longer a cosmetic issue as the lack of contact in this area WILL cause the sound to thin out a bit in the lower frequencies. In my experience, once the extra two screws are added and this area makes firm contact with the body, the sound gets "thicker" in the lower frequencies. The present material in the die cast tailpieces is actually much stronger than aluminum, but the break angle of the strings is steeper and the casting has more voids in it at the rear.
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

The 60's and early 70's tailpieces simply do not lift...
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

Dane, I agree with your accessment of the tone changes. I looked at my tailpiece (had a small 1/16" lift) and I added 3 flat washers beneath the lowest screws (the deepest body rout) because of the gap between the bottom of the tailpiece and the wood. That took kcare of the lift.

That and drilling out the recesses where the bridge allen screws seat so the screws touch wood made very noticable changes for the better. Less metalic sounding, deeper tone. I did not replace the bridge lift allen screws as they were always so high I kept catching my palm on them and now they are just protruding and no more catching.
User avatar
lucky
Member
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 5:00 am

Post by lucky »

Thank you guy's for the advice,and thanks Gary (e-mail sent).I think i may get the engineers in work to drill the two extra holes for me,as i have just bought a new tailpiece and with my track record with tailpieces,i'll let someone else do it as i like the tailpiece to be flush to the body.
User avatar
ajish4
RRF Moderator
Posts: 8566
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 6:00 am

Post by ajish4 »

C'mon guys,

You want to talk LIFT?

OK, I'll give you LIFT! Image

Anyone remember this one?

THIS IS NOT A GENUINE RICKENBACKER PART.

THIS IS A JAPANESE COPY RIC that was listed on Ebay a while ago!


Image
"Freedom of expression is important, but I have learned that people want to know how much you care before they care how much you know."
The only time a bass player gets noticed is when he stops playing.
User avatar
lucky
Member
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 5:00 am

Post by lucky »

Now that's lift.So would that be a fault with the design/shape of the Ric tailpiece or has Ric used different metals over the years.As Jeff said his 60's bass no lift,yet now various degrees of lift.Or is it the introduction of the roundwound string.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

I used rotosound strings on my 68 4001 for 33 years and it had absolutely zero tailpiece lift ... I think the metal was different back then ...

I don't think a real 4 string Ric would ever lift as badly as that picture ... but Gary had a 4003s5 that was almost that bad ...
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

My 64 4001S had Rotosounds on it through the 70's and 80's and also had zero lift.
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12659
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

Not quite as bad as that 'faker, but it still was scary:

Image

"... but it's, only a memory, only a memory ..."

Image
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

Gary ... you should put vintage knobs on that bass ...

And that is the worst pull up I have ever seen on a Ric bass ... I find it hard to believe that a 4 string Ric could ever get that bad ...
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Post by bassduke49 »

Count those strings again, Jeff. That's Gary's 4003S/5 "notreallyaBlackstar"!
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

ya that was my point ... that one pulled up that bad because it had 5 strings ... if it were a 4 stringer it would not have pulled up that badly ...
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”