So, you think your bass has tail lift?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
So, you think your bass has tail lift?
Check this out!
http://cgi.ebay.com/1974-Rickenbacker-4001-Bridge-Bent-Needs-Work_W0QQitemZ140062069263QQihZ004QQcategoryZ118984QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
http://cgi.ebay.com/1974-Rickenbacker-4001-Bridge-Bent-Needs-Work_W0QQitemZ140062069263QQihZ004QQcategoryZ118984QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
-
jwr2
-
prog_rockin_metal_man
- Member
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 2:37 pm
- Contact:
The lack of the screws that are visible when the bridge is in place is a pretty good reason for that kind of lift, not to mention possible use of sub-standard material.
I've also noticed that some copy tailpieces have the round casting marks on the underside in a more centered location than the RIC piece, shown here.

I've also noticed that some copy tailpieces have the round casting marks on the underside in a more centered location than the RIC piece, shown here.

Plus five minus five!
The fact that someone is selling such a pitiful excuse for a bridge/tailpiece assembly in such a sorry state, trying to pass it off as a legit Rick part in the process, is even more grotesque and pathetic if you ask me.
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Owen from England had one that was so bent the strings vibrated in the bridge and wouldn't seat properly, but that was a rare exception, I've had over 20 Rics and have never had one bend so bad it caused me any trouble, most of mine have either not bent at all or were bent less than a 1/16th of an inch which does nothing that I can see or hear.


