I dont have an apropiate measuring tool to measure this. But I did find out that the main reason that my '73 plays far more nicer than my '99 is neck width. Its almost a centimeter smaller. From thumb (behind neck) to fingers its not that much of a difference, but from E to G it is!!
Kevin, interesting stuff on that Jazz Bass. I have a USA '62 RI that , for me, has the perfect Fender neck. I'll get the measurements done for that one as well.
Kevin, what I did was to cut a piece of paper about 20cm long and 1cm wide. I then stretched it round the neck and marked this with a pencil at each of the three points. I then put the paper flat and measured the three off. Worked for me anyway.
Under the strings and pretty tight. The flexible tape I'm using is junk though.
I was trying to measure them and keep my daughter's sticky little fingers off at the same time! She shut the case on my Jazz Bass when I was doing that one. Could be I screwed something up. I'll double check tonight.
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
"John...thats a chunky neck. Good thing you've got those chunky hands to go with it! "
Yeah, Jeff, it sure looks like mine is a biggie. Interesting, as when I first tried it in the store I thought how narrow it felt! When I tried Jerry's 4005 at the 75th I thought it felt tiny in my hand. I do really like my 4004C's neck which is a tad wider but a lot thinner f to b.
For comparrison, are we interested in 4004 measurements? What about 2000 or 3000 series?
I re-measured last night. It was right. I even calibrated the tape to a pair of calipers. It was off less than .08 at 13cm.
If we are measuring in inches, are we all converting to cm the same? 1 inch = 2.54cm
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
Thanks for the double check, Kevin. All of my measurements were from a metric measuring tape. I would guess the same for AY from Japan and BA from the UK.