4004 Appreciation

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by aceonbass »

Here's a question for ya Eric. Why is the 4004 not offered as a fretless?
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

James - that's a nice looker! Image Hope it's a player too!

I see a little detail in the wood - nothing like those pics Jeff Rath posted but I bet it looks nice in person!
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
User avatar
eric_b
RIC
Posts: 480
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 12:16 pm

Post by eric_b »

Dane,I have no idea why there's no FL 4004! That sure would look nice though. As for the NAMM guitars,I get to take them all home afterwards for "safekeeping" ;-)
"It's not the obscene thick gloss, but how it's applied"
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by aceonbass »

The HB1's and their configuration would be a natural for a fretless 4004. I'm surprised I've never even seen one converted.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

My 1998 4004ci was a NAMM bass ...

Image
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

Damn!
Buy it before someone else does
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

No, NAMM!
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

Here it is as a five string bass ... it has pretty wood ...

http://www.3dentourage.com/425/98-4004ci5.htm

I may use it for gigs when I get to non-smoking Denver ... I didn't want to take it to bars here in Michigan because of the smoke here ...
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

Jeff, I always admired the wood on that bass and now I know why it lools especially nice.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

Ya I bought that one with money from the sale of my 68 ... and it is a player too ... it has a nice mid growl ...
joutten
New member
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 5:40 pm

Post by joutten »

I think I remember reading somewhere that RIC is releasing a new bridge assembly for the 4004 models. Anybody know if that's true and when that will be available?
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

I'm gonna miss that carpet...
Buy it before someone else does
User avatar
ricosound
Intermediate Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 11:36 am

Post by ricosound »

So without reading through the whole thread and searching the archives for discussion (lazy), has anyone ever tried 4004s with single coils? Does it give you the Rick sound using correct pot values. It would be kind of like a modern S series one would think.
No matter where you go - there you are.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

a 4004 with single coils has treble bite like an old 4001 ...
zoomduck
Member
Posts: 445
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:07 pm

Post by zoomduck »

Wes......I have single coil toasters in my 4004.....it's like Jeff said.......I love the sound more then my 4001 and no binding !
More throttle...Less brakes
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”