1964 cream 4001S on U.K. E-Bay

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

1964 cream 4001S on U.K. E-Bay

Post by wints »

Check this one out. Cream, stereo, and a certain "Squire" resides in Surrey...Couldn,t be...could it....
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

Nah, it's not his. The horseshoe was replaced with a high gain and it looks pretty beat up.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

Also, the pickguard cutout for the toaster looks pretty rough.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2545743493&category=4713
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Chris Squire's original 4001? You wish.
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

Yeh...just kidding. There,s enough documentation about CS,s original to know that this was never the real thing...however it does look like someone a long time ago wanted a Squire copy using a real 64 (possibly..) So if you want a CS edition that bodily IS closer to his original (especially in terms of neck radius) here,s your chance....
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12659
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

Are the open back tuners correct for this replica? I thought the older ones all had closed-back Grovers.

If I were the seller and had no evidence of age, I wouldn't indicate anywhere in the ad that it might be of 1960s origin. I saw a similar 'Squired' bass on eBay a year or so ago, and that seller, the modifier of the bass, had documented all the changes he had made to make the guitar as close to an original CS as possible.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

It looks like a 60's rick for sure, it has the square heel, and the tailpiece is unmistakeably "vintage".......someone just thought they were chris squire thats all.

The treble pickup looks a bit odd.....and the guys used strap bolts/mute screws on the pickup screws.....now whats the point in that?
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
User avatar
robj
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 9:02 am

Post by robj »

Call me skeptical but it looks to me like a 4001CS that has been at least partially re-finished and scruffed up to look like a much older bass.

The tuners are consistent with a 4001CS (I have one), the headstock finish in the middle is a slightly different color (it looks like the 4001CS color to me) than the rest of the bass. The headstock badge isn't original and there is no serial number. Why would converting the jack to stereo neccesitate changing out the jack plate? I'm thinking if the serial numbered plate were on the bass it would reveal the basses true age, which is why the jack plate was changed.

A real '64 4001s would of course be worth much more than a 4001CS which could motivate someone to pull off such a scam.

On the other hand maybe I had too much coffee this morning.
rickde
Member
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rickde »

Pricey.
User avatar
robj
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 9:02 am

Post by robj »

Also, the scratchplate has no finger rest or holes for one, which the 4001CS doesn't have either. I suspect the scratchplate is a copy made off the 4001CS' and whoever made it lacked the tools or expertise to properly cut out the hole for the toaster....

Man... I have had too much coffee.
ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

i dunno, it looks legit to me. The 60's basses had similar tuners to currenet ricks, its the early 70's that had the square ones (yes?) and the bridge is an old "rough" one, i think its a 64
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
dave4004
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1113
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 7:49 pm

Post by dave4004 »

Robj, I do believe you're on to something here (besides the coffee!). There are just way too many things that don't add up.
ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

i dunno, it looks legit to me. The 60's basses had similar tuners to currenet ricks, its the early 70's that had the square ones (yes?) and the bridge is an old "rough" one, i think its a 64
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

The tuners look like 60,s to me...old tarnished nickel klusons..if they have slotted screws securing them, then they probably are genuine. The truss rod cover is the same as my 64..made in u.s.a. under the Ric logo. The real deal would be to see under the pickguard. Any fireglo there? Are the holes there for the thumbrest? When do the pots date to? These things would tell us a little more..and would be essential to someone wanting to seriously buy @2.5K sterling...
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

BOTH pickups look odd. I suspect they are not legit.
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”