One For The History Books?

The short-scale model that changed history

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15123
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

One For The History Books?

Post by admin »

I wanted you to see this interesting Rickenbacker as I thought that it might generate some discussion. So will we call it a Rose-Morris 1996, a 325S or perhaps something different?
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
User avatar
glen_l
Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2000 3:43 pm
Contact:

Post by glen_l »

It's the Bisonbacker!
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15123
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

Glen: I have been calling it the Gibepibacker. Whatever we call it, it is nice to see the two o'clock f-hole leaving the factory on June 11, 1964 or so.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
User avatar
glen_l
Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2000 3:43 pm
Contact:

Post by glen_l »

Yes very interesting. Another little insight into timeframes back then. This one is stamped as an April '64 unit, but it wasn't shipped until that June. I guess this ties in well with the shipping of large batches to RM. Typically 25 or 50 I believe. The other interesting thing about this unit is that it's the last example I have of a 2 o'clock soundhole in my records. Now don't go saying that adds to it's value. Doesn't mean it's the last 2 o'clock RM1996 ever made.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15123
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

Interesting Glen. The question that comes to mind is whether this instrument is worth the asking price given the considerable modification. Having said this, if it was the "last" two o'clock RM made it may add to its value.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Post by jwilli »

It would be nice if someone bought this monstrosity just to restore it. I think that $4500. is still too high.
325-at-2pm
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2000 1:11 am

Post by 325-at-2pm »

John: As the resident appraisal expert, what price is right for that piece before and after fixup? Is the serial number in sequence with the others referred to around here that are from April 1964?
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Post by jwilli »

Greg, thats a hard one to answer. To make it "right" again, it would probably cost at least $1250., possibly more. It needs: correct fretboard, redoing the headstock, correct back, correct roller bridge, removal of the "plaque", and a refin. Now, after ALL of that is done, it STILL would be hard to put a "value" on it. I know one thing, it still wouldn't be worth as much as a correct, non-restored '64 1996, right? If I could get it for $3500. from the seller, I probably would buy it and have it put back right.
325-at-2pm
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2000 1:11 am

Post by 325-at-2pm »

John: If you bought it, you'd have to take the back off and the neck out and install a new neck with the correct fingerboard and headstock shape. Next put the new back on it. That Burn-style neck is not fixable. You would have $5000 in it at least if you paid $3500. I heard that he turned down more than that.

If you did all of this, would you make it round heal and voluted like all of the other 1964 April guitars floating around??

I hope a couple of dozen 2 o'clock 1964 325s drop out of the sky and drive the prices back down.
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Post by jwilli »

If you had to replace the whole neck, it wouldn;t be worth it. Wow, the only thing original would be the body top, guards, pick ups, tuners,and a couple of other pieces. Fah-ged-da-bout-it!

PS: I guess that this guitar originally came with rounded heel and volute, but we'll never know for sure........
Frank_S

Post by Frank_S »

Some people should not be allowed to possess tools.
GF

Post by GF »

John: If you owned it, do you have a luthier in mind? I know you have Randy Wood down your way.

What did you think of the price on the mid-late 1960s 381-6 project guitar?
tblair
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 241
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2000 12:52 pm
Contact:

Post by tblair »

I'm curious about thoughts on that 381 too. $910.00 for a stripped guitar with no hardware and bad binding sounds a bit steep to me- but then the old 381s are pretty hard to come by.
User avatar
glen_l
Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2000 3:43 pm
Contact:

Post by glen_l »

Very good point John. Does that mean that the thing is only good for parts value? heheheh. Who can say. I'd hazard a guess that the original neck would have had round heel and volute. Late April by my records.

If one was going to make a square heel and non volute neck, you may as well go the whole hog and make a replacement 'solidtop' body!
fatrat

Post by fatrat »

I have seen that 325 whatever on Ebay for sale....
I wonder if it sold???

FATRAT
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Vintage 325 Models: by Glen Lambert”