Rickenfaker?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- 12stringbassist
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 7:44 am
- Contact:
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
One of my favorite indicators of a faker is the color of the fretboard wood and inlays. This one looks spot-on to be genuine.
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
― Kurt Vonnegut
- bob_the_bass
- Member
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:29 am
Rickenfaker?
First one is genuine
Second one is a joke
Second one is a joke
Why does it happen? Because it happens - Roll the Bones !!
They have had quite a number of Rics go through Capsule over the years although it's been a while since they posted one. I would hope they would spot a faker. I don't think they would pass off a copy as the real thing.
Most fireglo 4001 basses have a nice amber tint to them now but sometimes the photograph does not really represent the actual colour.
Most fireglo 4001 basses have a nice amber tint to them now but sometimes the photograph does not really represent the actual colour.
Hmm... I agree.
Yesterday a local guy brought his early '70s Kay "4001" over for some adjustments and repairs. Besides being a copy, the instrument screams "poor quality". It looks almost homemade. Only the pickups on it, though they're microphonic and not very pleasant to look at, do have some quality, meaning they're hot and sound good. If I remember correctly, Kay did produce some nice, original instruments in the '60s and maybe '50s. Why did they then decide to start producing poor quality copies? Is the company still around? (I don't believe so)
Yesterday a local guy brought his early '70s Kay "4001" over for some adjustments and repairs. Besides being a copy, the instrument screams "poor quality". It looks almost homemade. Only the pickups on it, though they're microphonic and not very pleasant to look at, do have some quality, meaning they're hot and sound good. If I remember correctly, Kay did produce some nice, original instruments in the '60s and maybe '50s. Why did they then decide to start producing poor quality copies? Is the company still around? (I don't believe so)
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
"... here is a German guitar maker, who is trying to make a unique high quality instrument, but chooses to copy other makes styles"
Maybe they think they can improve on the original design, like Lull, Sadowsky etc. building boutique Fender style basses. They do so not because they want to copy other make's style, or because they can't come up with their own design, but simply because that is what their customers ask them to build.
Compared to many original-design boutique basses, usually with wild "organic" shapes or those single-cutaway high-ends with those horrid lumps, you have to admit this one looks much better.
Maybe they think they can improve on the original design, like Lull, Sadowsky etc. building boutique Fender style basses. They do so not because they want to copy other make's style, or because they can't come up with their own design, but simply because that is what their customers ask them to build.
Compared to many original-design boutique basses, usually with wild "organic" shapes or those single-cutaway high-ends with those horrid lumps, you have to admit this one looks much better.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
