Checker binding
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Hi, Paul. Yes, I remember that. I usually post more over on VT, but lurk around the Ric forum every now and then. Ric's rule. Enjoy your Shadow!
325c64 JG,325c58 JG, 325/12v63 JG, 350v63 JG, 1996 AFG, 360/12c63 FG, 360/6 Carl Wilson FG, 1993Plus FG, 660/12 FG, 425 FG (1965), 360/12 FG (1965/67), 335 FG (1966), 4003S FG (with v63 mods), 1997 RM Reissue FG
Correction:
"...a 4003 Shadow with the white-on-black checkered binding would be ultra sexy and cool! But I guess one only exists in my imagination and will never see the light of day".
I meant binding on the headstock of a 4003 Shadow.
Man, no coffee after waking up is quite a head-messing situation.My apology for the error.
"...a 4003 Shadow with the white-on-black checkered binding would be ultra sexy and cool! But I guess one only exists in my imagination and will never see the light of day".
I meant binding on the headstock of a 4003 Shadow.
Man, no coffee after waking up is quite a head-messing situation.My apology for the error.
That one I'll have to check on, as I have used it with my Korg D-16 recorder only once so far, and that was for only a short time (that's the only time I have used the XLR jack so far). According to the schematic posted at the RIC web site:
http://www.rickenbacker.com/us/19513.htm
you are correct, only the treble pickup is shown going to the XLR output.
Something else I need to do is to check the weight of the 4002 vs. other 4000 series basses. I have the impression that the 4002 is heavier than a typical 4001 or 4003.
http://www.rickenbacker.com/us/19513.htm
you are correct, only the treble pickup is shown going to the XLR output.
Something else I need to do is to check the weight of the 4002 vs. other 4000 series basses. I have the impression that the 4002 is heavier than a typical 4001 or 4003.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
-
jeff_ulmer
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 6:00 am
- Contact:





