Old style nameplate or newer style ?

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
rob320

Old style nameplate or newer style ?

Post by rob320 »

I've always prefered the older style nameplate's as i think the newer raised one's look, dare i say it, a little cheap on such beautifully made and finished instruments. I don't know what everyone else thinks but why don't Rickenbacker revert to the original design for all their guitars, or is it a question of cost ? Just a thought.
dave4004
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1113
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 7:49 pm

Post by dave4004 »

IMHO the newer raised ones look much nicer. At any rate I'd guess the real reason they are raised is to make counterfeiting more difficult.
mortivan

Post by mortivan »

Strangely enough, I think the older nameplates look cheaper.
rob
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1037
Joined: Mon May 21, 2001 10:01 am

Post by rob »

I have never seen, yet, the new style raised letter nameplate.

I have seen the non-raised letter version.

IMHO, I do like the raised letter nameplate better.

As for counterfeiting, I don't think it would be too difficult with the raised letter. The non-raised version, with the name silkscreened (?) would be a little more tricky.

I say this because of many businesses in the plastic injection molding. If someone who works in a tool-room mold shop has a raised letter nameplate, he/she probably can make a small mold out of it. (Please don't get any ideas, anyone!)

So, IMHO, I think it would be in the best interest for the company to switch over the "flat" nameplate. I feel that's a bit more harder to duplicate.
User avatar
paul_yan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2119
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 2:09 pm
Contact:

Post by paul_yan »

I've seen the raised letter ones in both black and white forms, but have only seen the silkscreened ones in white.

Did RIC ever produce silkscreened ones in black?
User avatar
banta
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 5:00 am

Post by banta »

No Paul, I don't think the reverse-screened ones were ever done in black as the black TRCs came out after the change was made to the embossed style. Like some others have said, I'm also of the opinion that the embossed TRCs look better. One of the ways I've 'customized' my basses is to paint the raised lettering to match the basses better.
User avatar
banta
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 5:00 am

Post by banta »

Another thing - the newer embossed TRCs are also harder to counterfeit.
User avatar
paul_yan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2119
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 2:09 pm
Contact:

Post by paul_yan »

Thanks for sharing the fact, Brad.

I personally like the embossed type a lot...the pure white background contrasts really well with the black raised letters. White, gold or silver on black is cool too.

However the revere-screened TRC on my '72 4001 Fretless MG, whose white looks a bit grayer under the clear plexiglass, also suits her vintage look very well. My feeling is: Reverse-screen for the old and emboss for the young basses.
User avatar
longhouse
Advanced Member
Posts: 2103
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 6:43 pm
Contact:

Post by longhouse »

The VINTAGE-style nameplates are much classier than the raised letter variety.
No comparison.
Noel
Shaking the floor of Heaven
User avatar
banta
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 5:00 am

Post by banta »

Robert Fronckowiak said:
As for counterfeiting, I don't think it would be too difficult with the raised letter. The non-raised version, with the name silkscreened (?) would be a little more tricky.

I say this because of many businesses in the plastic injection molding. If someone who works in a tool-room mold shop has a raised letter nameplate, he/she probably can make a small mold out of it. (Please don't get any ideas, anyone!)

So, IMHO, I think it would be in the best interest for the company to switch over the "flat" nameplate. I feel that's a bit more harder to duplicate.

No way, Rob. There are literally ten thousand shops that could quite easily & inexpensively forge the older screened TRCs. There are less than a hundred facilities that could even make a replica of the newer embossed TRC, and it would cost significantly more in setup.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by aceonbass »

Actually, RIC did make black silk screened TRC's. My Dec.'75 3000 came with just such a piece. The lettering almost looks silver and it also says "Made In USA" but without the model# below it like the TRC's on my other basses. The bass it came on was a wreck missing the original pickguard and pickup. It's currently undergoing restoration and conversion to fretless. The body has been done in deep pearl blue urethane with a clear guard backed in white pearl and a toaster top with vintage knobs and new electronics. Anyway, I prefer the silkscreened TRC's and have made gold and white one's for most of my basses along with old style gold, white and black guards to match.
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

I like both on the appropriate basses like Paul said, but I would like to see the model # put back on the TRC's. It's little touches like that that makes me like the older ones. I also like the reverse tuners on the mid to late 70's 4001's, they are actually easier to turn and easier to tune with. Turning your hand clockwise to raise the pitch just seems natural to me.
User avatar
paul_yan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2119
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 2:09 pm
Contact:

Post by paul_yan »

Hey Dane,
Would you please post a picture of the black silk-screened TRC of your 3000? Gotta be cool looking.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by aceonbass »

Sure..as soon as I can get my wife to take a digital pic of it so I can send it to the administrator to post. AOL was so much easier to do this with even though it was dial-up. I'll get her to take pics of all my Rickys to post here.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”