4003 headstock change

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
xsubs
Member
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 5:22 am

4003 headstock change

Post by xsubs »

I searched but couldn't find info regarding the headstock changes for the 4003. I know that for many years, since its inception, the headstock was shaped like the '70s 4001 basses. The short design with the long skinny cresting wave, and the A & D tuners placed nearly next to one another.
What year did Ric change to the current headstock shape?
I'm thinking around '96 or so...
Thanks!
Sean
Rickenbacker '64 & '68 4001 basses ♦ Fender Pre-CBS J & P Basses and 1968 Telecaster Bass ♦ Moog Taurus III Bass Pedals ♦ Hiwatt (Hylight) Amplification
"A good bassist determines the direction of any band."- Ron Carter
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

Initially the 4003 head was identical to the 4001 head except for the shedua stripe. They both have narrow ears. I think the modern rod system and the first headstock change happened at the same time (mid '84). RIC changed the way the neck slabs were shaped. A 4001 has a rectangular neck slab. That is the slab is the same width at the end button as it is at the tip of the headstock. 4003's after '84 have neck slabs that taper. The head end is slightly narrower than the end button end. The taper allowed for wider ears that more closely resemble the 60's heads. At that time the size of the head increased slightly. In the early 90's the head ears became more sculptured in appearance. These are my favorite headstocks. The points on the lower ear became longer and the curve was made more broad. Later in the 90's the cresting wave at the tip became shallower giving the headstock a more bulbous shape that some people don't like. 96' is a good gues as to when it happened. The bulbous shape continues to today but RIC has added a second CNC program with a thinner neck profile that has a head with a more early 90's shape. RICK is producing both necks for now and may settle on one at some point.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

Here is a 70's headstock.

Image

The very slightly larger 80's headstock

Image

The elegant early 90's headstock

Image

I don't have the more bubous one here to show though.
User avatar
jsod
Junior Member
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 4:14 am

Post by jsod »

1977 4001:
Image

2006 4003 (with bulbous crest):
Image


Ted, is that black headstock from a pre-1997 V63?
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

Yep, a '94 to be exact. It was once part of the Seligman collection.
User avatar
marc61
Senior Member
Posts: 6443
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:31 am
Contact:

Post by marc61 »

Love how Ted has to show the headstocks of a 4002,red neck and v63 to prove his point...heavy drool from the entire board might blow out the servers Ted, be careful Image
" It's not where you are, it's who you're with.".
User avatar
marc61
Senior Member
Posts: 6443
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:31 am
Contact:

Post by marc61 »

apologies...80's headstock is not redneck....but Ted has it somewhere...
" It's not where you are, it's who you're with.".
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

Yes, the Redneck is put away right now. I just used what ever basses were out. The AG 4001 would have been a better choice for the 70's heastock but it is buried right now.

The 4002 is out because it is awaiting its trip to the Thomas residence. The V63 is right next to it. Also up are my MG 4003S/5 and the Shadow.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

the 4001/4003 has gone through some changes ... before they started making them with the cnc machine they varied a little year by year ...

the main changes were ... in the 60s the headstock was the big elegant headstock with walnut headwings ... in the 70s the neck got fatter, the body wings got fatter and the headstock got smaller ... with the 4003 the headstock gat a slight tilt back ... in 1997 Rickenbacker went back to the elegant 60s headstock shape ... and about 2005 or 2006 they brought back the walnut headwings ... the 4004, 4001v63, 4001c64, and 4001cs all adopted the 60s headstock shape before 1997 and the walnut headwings seem to come and go on the 4004 bass ...
User avatar
hieronymous
Intermediate Member
Posts: 837
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:46 pm
Contact:

Post by hieronymous »

'76 4001 ATG headstock (which I prefer):
Image

And wicked huge '82 FG 4008 (sorry, I couldn't resist!):
Image
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ken_j »

'91V63
Image
"The best things in life aren't things."
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

a 1989 4003s5 headstock ...
Image

a 1990s 4004ci headstock ...
Image

a 60s 4005/6 headstock ...
Image

a 1968 4001 headstock ... this is the shape that always looked right for me ...
Image

a 1973 4001 headstock ... for me the shortened headstocks always looked wrong ...
Image

a 2005 4004ci headstock ...
Image

a 1993 2020 4-2-5 headstock ...
Image
User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Post by heinpete »

My 2cts:
a 2004 4004CiiTR (changed to chrome hard ware)
Image
and my recently restored 1974 4001FG (with red side dots!)

Image
"The youth of today should start thinking about the state in which they want to leave this planet to Keith Richards..."! Quote by an unknown musician
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

the headstocks where the A and D tuners lined up always looks wrong to me ...
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Post by teeder »

Ken,

Show more of that '91 V63! Image
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”