Early 4001 V63 question.

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Early 4001 V63 question.

Post by godber »

I'm confused about this one. Did any early (1992/3) 4001 V63s have a high gain neck PUP, raised letter TRCs or one piece bridge cover? Any help appreciated.

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

That is not a v63. That is a 4003s. You can also tell by the 1" spacing, fat upper horn, and bridge higain.

The v63 began production in '84-'85, so '92 would not be an "early" one.
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Post by godber »

Thanks for the fast info John. There are so many variations out there - I'm embarrassed to say that I didn't even know they did 4003's without binding.

Has anyone produced a definitive picture library of all the configurations?
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

Go here, and click on the "models" link on the left: http://www.rickbeat.com/

It's probably the most comprehensive out there.
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

Hi Mark,
John's right, also, rear pickup surround would be tapered, rear pickup would a a reissue-Horseshoe, wings are Maple, and would be Walnut, controls are those usually found on the 4003's , the v63 has the older solid black

Finish looks lovely though !!
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Post by godber »

Yeah, I liked the deep colour too. I've seen the rickbeat site, which is a vast collection. It seems that the only way to get all the detail is to eek it out bit-by-bit on this, or the Rickenbacker forum.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Post by teeder »

Also, a V wouldn't have the 19th position marker.

Still a very nice looking bass!
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

That S pictured above is a very nice bass. While not a V63 it is certainly an excellent example of the S model in FG. Not too shabby!
User avatar
lars
RRF Consultant
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by lars »

On ebay...
User avatar
bobcat
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:54 pm

Post by bobcat »

Also, a V63 has walnut headstock wings . . .
User avatar
squirebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1581
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 11:05 pm

Post by squirebass »

I personally like the "S" models a lot, and that one above is a beautiful fireglo... There are several regulars around here who specialize in S models, Ed Dupont is one, I can't think of the other one. That is one beautiful bass, Mark, I think fireglo looks especially good on the S model.
"This is the big one, Elizabeth, I'm coming to join ya, honey!"
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”