Erk!!! Need I say any more?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
sowhat
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5380
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by sowhat »

Diaperglo.
Nothing will get you dead quicker than being deadly serious about yourself.
User avatar
bobcat
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:54 pm

Post by bobcat »

Thank god it's not lunchtime while I'm reading this . . .

Also, it basically looks like they took a Rick knock-off and tried to make it as much like a Peavey Cirrus as possible . . . why?! The Cirrus is not only a completely different bass, but it looks great too . . . there's no need whatsoever to change its look, especially not to a bass that is very nearly its opposite, tonewise.
User avatar
rikk
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 3:04 pm

Post by rikk »

Looking at that you realize how good a RIC bass is visually. It's a striking design that holds up well over time. Even the 4004's are beautiful. This faker is similar to a 4004 in it's features, but clearly the "design" is not there.
User avatar
jim_morris
New member
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:28 pm

Post by jim_morris »

oh god that's freakin horrible. just goes to show how little changes here and there can make a beautiful design look uber tacky.
A little pain never hurt anyone.
scala
Junior Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 3:42 am

Post by scala »

"Ricks don't need no stinkin' (see discussion about color above) modernizing"

hey jeffery, you a blazing saddles fan?
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Post by teeder »

Excuse me while I whip this out!
Image
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37515
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

I love Mel's work but I wasn't crazy about that movie.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

that bass is a work of art ... a non-aesthetic miss-shaped body and a fecal-burst color ... the Luthier is related to Picasso ...
gshadoan
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 368
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2000 11:23 pm

Post by gshadoan »

Im surprised that this one is still on. After all the shape is unmistabablly a RIC, and skirting the trade mark here is splitting hairs IMO. I wonder why RIC can't move on this one. Is there really that much of a difference, or is it the local that is the issue?
User avatar
elysrand
Advanced Member
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 6:00 am

Post by elysrand »

I still think it has enough points of dissimilarity to make it a little tougher to interdict. There is a percentage and qualitative standard to being clean in issuing a Cease And Desist. My gut is that this one is not enough of a clear-cut clone on enough confusingly-similar trademark points...
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, and sit in with the band whenever you can, to keep your chops up!
User avatar
bassassin
Junior Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:51 pm
Contact:

Post by bassassin »

This is quite an interesting one. A UK online-only brand, Wesley, sold this particular bass through Ebay last year, but subsequently withdrew it "due to a legal dispute with a major manufacturer". Their remaining stock was sold (not through Ebay) at a clearout price and the model withdrawn.

It's not exactly rocket science to work out who the "major manufacturer" was (unless Peavey had a go over the headstock!) so I'm surprised this current auction is still ongoing.

Jon.
All Your Bass Are Belong To Us
User avatar
lyle_from_minneapolis
Advanced Member
Posts: 2530
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:13 pm

Post by lyle_from_minneapolis »

I think it would be embarrassing for Rickenbacker to recognize any resemblance to their work...
Here is where I hide my music:
http://www.soundclick.com/MarkKaufman
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”