A comparison between the 4000 and 4001?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
A comparison between the 4000 and 4001?
i've got my eye on a 4000.
can anyone with experience w/ both the 4000 and 4001 models offer a qualitative comparison between the 'sound' of the two models?
thanks
can anyone with experience w/ both the 4000 and 4001 models offer a qualitative comparison between the 'sound' of the two models?
thanks
The 4001 is more 'hi-fi', more balanced. The 4000 is raw, aggressive, cuts through a muddy mix like a chainsaw.
You can get mellow tones from a 4000, but you have to play closer to the neck & use less attack.
Playing a 4001 with just the bridge pup on gets you close, but a 4000 seems to have even more edge, though lacks a little low end, due to the pickup placement (easily overcome with amp eq).
Being a set neck (most of them, anyway) some might say there's possibly less sustain, but I find mine has tons of sustain. It also has never needed ANY neck adjustment, & plays beautifully.
As a matter of fact, I play my 4001 more often because if I play the 4000 a lot, my left hand gets 'lazy' & needs more of a workout.
If you buy one & don't like it, you'll be able to sell it here easily. There always seems to be someone looking for a 4000.
You can get mellow tones from a 4000, but you have to play closer to the neck & use less attack.
Playing a 4001 with just the bridge pup on gets you close, but a 4000 seems to have even more edge, though lacks a little low end, due to the pickup placement (easily overcome with amp eq).
Being a set neck (most of them, anyway) some might say there's possibly less sustain, but I find mine has tons of sustain. It also has never needed ANY neck adjustment, & plays beautifully.
As a matter of fact, I play my 4001 more often because if I play the 4000 a lot, my left hand gets 'lazy' & needs more of a workout.
If you buy one & don't like it, you'll be able to sell it here easily. There always seems to be someone looking for a 4000.
Plus five minus five!
At the risk of sounding trite, unless you are talking about a very early 4000, it should sound pretty much like a 4001 with the selector switch down. The wood, pickups, bridge, nut, and overall geometry are the same so the sound will follow. Of course, the 70's version has a set neck which does alter the tone but not radically.
This is, of course, based on the sound of my own 4000 & 4001, which BTW, differ in weight significantly (the 4001 being WAY heavier), not merely due to the extra hardware onboard, but due also to the particular pieces of wood involved in these two.
I don't pretend to speak for other examples, but anyone could easily distinguish between my 4001 treble pup & my 4000.
I don't pretend to speak for other examples, but anyone could easily distinguish between my 4001 treble pup & my 4000.
Plus five minus five!
Here's a quick wmv I slapped up on MySpace.
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=2013102513
Recorded through my Fostex 4-track as an input device into my Soundblaster card, recorded with Audacity, no effects, all bass controls set at maximum, stock RIC pickups.
Even a glance at the waveform shows quite a difference in the two signals.
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=2013102513
Recorded through my Fostex 4-track as an input device into my Soundblaster card, recorded with Audacity, no effects, all bass controls set at maximum, stock RIC pickups.
Even a glance at the waveform shows quite a difference in the two signals.
Plus five minus five!
The 4000 was first, and the cap has been long removed from the 4001.
Both basses have the action as low as I can get it with just the beginnings of fret buzz.
The difference in harmonics are more evident with higher action, & amplified to a decent volume.
I should add that the strings on the 4000 are rather old Fender stainless rounds, & the 4001 has fairly new D'Addario nickel rounds.
The D'Addario's are good strings, BTW, nice & snappy! I like 'em almost as much as RIC strings (which I have on my 4080).
Not so fond of the Fenders, & they lose their edge faster than the RIC & D'Addario's.
Both basses have the action as low as I can get it with just the beginnings of fret buzz.
The difference in harmonics are more evident with higher action, & amplified to a decent volume.
I should add that the strings on the 4000 are rather old Fender stainless rounds, & the 4001 has fairly new D'Addario nickel rounds.
The D'Addario's are good strings, BTW, nice & snappy! I like 'em almost as much as RIC strings (which I have on my 4080).
Not so fond of the Fenders, & they lose their edge faster than the RIC & D'Addario's.
Plus five minus five!
I have had several 4000's, set neck and neck through. They are in deed a completly different animal. It is the ric mans Pee bass. The 4001/3 is a much more versital beast. Not to say the 4K is a one trick pony, but it generally is a bass you rarly mess with. Turn it on full and go. At least IMHE.
Now a single pickup 4004....... thats what Im talkin about LOL.
Now a single pickup 4004....... thats what Im talkin about LOL.

