Combo w/ a odd headstock?

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
jsm610
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1074
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by jsm610 »

The headstock looks off to me too, especially when you look at the back and reference the spacing and position of the keywinds to some reference photos. Plus, the headstock looks painted?

"it looks like a great one for the Wilczynski treatment"
I'm hoping for the Minutaglio treatment: buy it, restring it, play it. Image
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

John, have you no sense of adventure?

My bandsaw is in need of exercise...
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
jsm610
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1074
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by jsm610 »

"John, have you no sense of adventure? "

Ok, let's cut it up and make a Combo 600 Lightshow.

You wanted adventure - take them apples!

Image
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

Paul, I dunno about it being factory left-handed, I can't buy into that just yet....but I see where you're coming from.

These guitars would have had to be purpose-built instruments from a construction standpoint no matter what direction they pointed, issues like the shape of the neck where it attatches to the body and the body itself in relation to the cutaways. A Mirror-image headstock by itself doesn't make much sense to me for it is only for aesthetic purposes only and wouldn't affect the guitar's playability either right or left handed.

As I said earlier Fender was the only one doing a mirror-image lefty in the 50s, Gibson simply flipped their neck due to it's asymmetrical design. Rickenbacker's lefty necks were right-handed and flipped on the hollow-body and neck-thru models until the late 80's....

Anything is possible, but what we see on this guitar goes against the grain of what they did with everything else. While maybe not lengthened or shortened, to my eye it does look narrower and the tuners seem to be spaced differently then most of these Combos that we see. Who knows..Image

Oh yeah, the wear on the body plate and the nut (to me) looks like it was from a right-handed player.....
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

John M, while we're at it, let's make it a slant-fret, too...

John S, you make a pretty strong case, and you're a much more experienced Rick historian than me...

In any event, this is interesting material for speculation!
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
tblair
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 241
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2000 12:52 pm
Contact:

Post by tblair »

This looks to me like the headstock has just been chopped up.

If you compare the headstock to a normal one, the high part on the left is about where the low part would have normally been. It looks like they then lowered the tuners & reshaped the sides to confuse everybody (and plugged the old holes & repainted it).

The headstock of the Combo 800 above is probably not the best for comparison, as it has an abnormally large truss cover. This one is a bit more normal:

Combo Headstock

Certainly some funky stuff going on with this one. Maybe somebody took the Gerry Marsden approach to fitting it into a small case.
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

"...Maybe somebody took the Gerry Marsden approach to fitting it into a small case..."

LOL!
User avatar
8mileshigh
Senior Member
Posts: 3532
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 6:00 am

Post by 8mileshigh »

"The headstock of the Combo 800 above is probably not the best for comparison, as it has an abnormally large truss cover."................

That's not the first time someone's said I have an abnormally large truss cover! Image
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

That's why you rent Chrysler 300s when you come here, Graham.....LOL!!!!!
tblair
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 241
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2000 12:52 pm
Contact:

Post by tblair »

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, over 3-Grand for this one.
User avatar
jsm610
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1074
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by jsm610 »

3 grand + maybe $2k of work. I'm surprised.


Image
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

I agree John. Total resto on this one.....
dale_fortune
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:00 am

Post by dale_fortune »

I would estimate about 1K for restoration...These are pretty simple with no binding to deal with. The peghead will need to be grafted on the end, a refret and possible refinish, but it looks as though the body is still original and may be alright...
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”