Seymour Duncan Replacement Pickups for Rics...

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
brentsimons
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 5:24 am

Seymour Duncan Replacement Pickups for Rics...

Post by brentsimons »

Hi All,
Just wondering if any of you have used the Seymour Duncan replacement pickups for the 4003/4001? Is it possible to reinstall my original pickups if I didn't enjoy the tone of the new ones?
Brent
dave4004
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1113
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 7:49 pm

Post by dave4004 »

Yes, I've heard them, nothing wrong with them but IMO it's not a Rickenbacker-style tone at all.

Yes, you can reinstall the originals. AFAIK there is no modification involved.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

I have some ... you want them? I can give you a good price ...

I tried it and didn't like them ... this is a reversable mod ...

If you want humbuckers get a 4004 ...
ssajr

Post by ssajr »

I replaced the stock pickups in my 4003 with Seymour Duncans several years ago; not only did they alleviate 60 cycle hum, the instrument sounds much "bassier" and packs a lot more mid-range punch. The SDs also come with a plastic mounting plate for the bridge pickup which looks much cleaner than the "trench" the stock pickup was mounted in. I'll try to post some pics later today.

Sherm
ssajr

Post by ssajr »

picks of my Seymour DuncansImageImage
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

Most of us here don't like the look or sound of the replacement pickups.

If you want to make a 4001 louder and fuller take out the bass cut capaciter ... that is the biggest reason the Seymour Duncan replacement pickups sound better to those who like them is because in the process of installation the capaciter is removed.

For me I love the modern Ric pickups from 1990 to present ... they are thunderous ...
mortivan

Post by mortivan »

Most of us here don't like the look or sound of the replacement pickups.

Or replacement bridges LOL!
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Those Seymours totally suck on a Rickenbacker bass, period. Go for a set of original Rick pickups, or have someone build new, improved pickups for your Rickenbacker bass.
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
mortivan

Post by mortivan »

Brent,

Sergio has been known to wind some killer pickups ...
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13212
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Post by rickenbrother »

I've also tried the Seymour Duncan replacement pickups in a 4003, I didn't like them, I put back the original RIC pickups within a few weeks. I didn't think there that much of a significant change in output from the SD pickups either.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
weemac
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2735
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2002 1:28 am

Post by weemac »

I had the SD neck pickup in a few different basses. It sounded fine in all of them apart from the Ric, it sounded a little weak on the E string if I remember rightly....
I confused Faraday's cage, with Schrodinger's cat box....
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Sherman,
what year is your 4003? If it is post-1989 the newer pickups are more powerful, with more bass and mid. They are great sounding, powerful pickups, but each to his own, there are a lot of differing opinions here. Although as was stated before most of us like Ric pickups best.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”