'Bulbous' headstock question.

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

Tease!
Play what you love, love what you play!
User avatar
squirebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 11:05 pm

Post by squirebass »

Sergio did you find another 21 fret bass?
"This is the big one, Elizabeth, I'm coming to join ya, honey!"
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

Jeff ... to me both of those headstocks have the same shape ...
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

I agree with Jeff, the Monty's headstock is shorter than the MG's but the cresting waves look the same shape to me.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by aceonbass »

They are very similar. The bulbous one is a bit thicker at the tip, but the giveaway is the length of the headstock indicated by the truss rod cover.
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

That would be privileged information, Gene...Image
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
jojo99
Member
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:54 pm

Post by jojo99 »

The deal killer on buying a CS/vintage reissue for me was that most of them have the un-authentic bulbous headstock instead of the correct narrow elongated one. RIC switched from the correct headstock on the CS to the bulbous one at some early point...why??
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by aceonbass »

That's a good question and I agree that the bulbous headstock along with the incorrect appearing bridge pickup surround are two reasons that a later CS4001 would not appeal to me.
alansan
New member
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 4:25 am

Post by alansan »

I also find it strange that some 4001v63s and 64s have a pickguard that doesn't quite touch the edge of the bridge pickup surround and some fit perfectly. But perhaps that's a naeive way to look at a factory made instrument.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

The vintage pickguards varied a lot so this is nothing new; think of it as hand crafted. Image

Image
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

Sometimes its hard to tell the difference. If we were comparing only vintage TRC headstocks it would be easier as the TRC ends about 1/8" from the end of the headstock on the bulbous headstock and about 1/2" from the headstock end on the non-bulbous headstock. I don't have any close-up photos with vintage TRCs except for the lefty below, but maybe more examples would help.:

2004 bulbous:
Image

2004 lefty non-bulbous:
Image

2005 bulbous:
Image

2006 non-bulbous:
Image
Play what you love, love what you play!
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

It's hard to find two vintage guards from the 60's that are exactly the same....

The V and C are being replicated perfectly in that regard!
User avatar
seabass
Junior Member
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:49 pm

Post by seabass »

It seems that the evolution of the CS headstock coincided with that of the 4003 and V-63. Didn't they all change at about the same time? So does that make the reissues just 4003S's with different pickups (and finish)?
I have a '91 V-63 with the long beautiful headstock. And my '97 CS has the shorter bulbous one. But regardless of the headstock, the CS is my best Rickenbacker. Just a killer bass!
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by aceonbass »

I guess it would have been one thing if they had just taken a 4003S,"Squire-ized" it and called it a 4003CS. However, instead, they started out with a fairly accurate reproduction and then kind of melted it into the regular line, although it did keep the vermillion wood treatments, color and pickguard. I just find that odd.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

Yes, Dave the V63, CS, and 4003 headstock all changed at the same time in 1997. I suspect that the change was made in order to "standardize" the production of bass necks by RIC. Prior to 1997, the 4003 had the shorter headstock; basically the same one that had been used since the 70's 4001's. The 4001V63 on the other hand got the (quite different) 60's headstock. Sometime in 1997, RIC changed to the bulbous headstock for all three of the above models.

I'm not sure I know what you're asking about re-issues being 4003S's with different pickups, but the two models do have a lot in common. The 4003S ceased production right before the bulbous headstock appeared. I've never seen a 4003S with the bulbous headstock.
Play what you love, love what you play!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”