1969 rick 4001 on the bay

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

scala
Junior Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 3:42 am

1969 rick 4001 on the bay

Post by scala »

any thoughts on this one, the seller also has a case for sale in another auction.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120111104298&indexURL=1&photoDisplayType=2#ebayphotohosting
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

Beautiful...

Looks very original apart from what the seller mentions and has that mojo factor in spades. The 69 FG goes dark for a few months and this is a lovely example.

The seller knows his history too. I think he could well be a lurker here!

Now, how much will it go for?
User avatar
elysrand
Advanced Member
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 6:00 am

Post by elysrand »

He is confusing only in the area talking about the wing separation and the two graphite rods Image Other than that, it is a good dark-FG period example. It is remarkable how similar this bass is to the 1968 German FG I bought earlier this year. In that bass, the bridge pickup is exactly the same kind of pickup with a bar magnet underneath. I suspect that one of two things is true - either the 1968 originally had the "transitional 1969" pickup as one of the first so-equipped, or much more likely the owner of the bass hated the shoes covering the strings, wanted them removed, and the dealer at the time swapped off the original pickup with a 1969 version that allowed removal of the cosmetic cover for free access to the strings.

I have of course replaced that bridge pickup with genuine 1968 shoes Image

The price-compression issue will keep most US buyers away, with the Pound Sterling at an all-time high Image

I bought the German 1968 for the equivalent of about $5600 USD after all the dust settled in January 2007, including Vince taking a good run on it. (Yes I sniped in the last three seconds, but whaddaya want Image ) So, it needs new reverse Klusons and a replacement pickguard and nut - all are very inexpensive except perhaps the Klusons (still hunting a set - anyone got Klusons out there? Image ), but at the worst I can use vintage reissues.

Comparatively this auction is for a much-worse quality finish and more corroded hardware, is only a few months newer, has the same dark-FG period finish, and is starting at $5100 USD! Image

I would much rather save for a 1965 to 1967 4001 in a more-rare finish.

This museum-minty all-original Jan 1970 21-fretter has spoiled me, taking some of the fire out of my belly for projects. Now I am more into waiting for that rare NOS case queen now, not a project with mismatched tuners and corroded hardware, and a really skinned-up finish.

I suspect that the wing separation issue and the graphite rods is, in reality, a reference to the standard small separation due to truss rod misadjustment technique, causing the fingerboard to separate from the neck slightly from the nut to the first fret. No big deal, easily repaired by a knowledgeable luthier without rods.

I do think that Rick-hysteria will take this one up to at least $8000 USD, and maybe $9500 or more....
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, and sit in with the band whenever you can, to keep your chops up!
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Post by teeder »

Oh My! Anyone need a slightly used Jazz Bass?

Talking it down and then snipe in at the end, Elys? Image
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
phlemmy

Post by phlemmy »

what color is the jazz bass?
User avatar
elysrand
Advanced Member
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 6:00 am

Post by elysrand »

Well, Kev, if you really want me to talk down your Jazz Bass and then snipe it at the end, you'll have to put it up on eBay first...

Then, tell me how far you want the talking-down to go, and I will do my best to oblige Image
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, and sit in with the band whenever you can, to keep your chops up!
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Post by teeder »

That's OK, Elys! Image

Sean, Just a basic Sunburst.

Image
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
User avatar
elysrand
Advanced Member
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 6:00 am

Post by elysrand »

Hey, Kevin, that basic SunburstGlo on the right is just fine for me! Pack her up and my $500 is on the way Image
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, and sit in with the band whenever you can, to keep your chops up!
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Post by teeder »

If I still had her, I would have sold her to you for $499.00! Image

She was nice, but just didn't seem to fit me.

Actually, the Jazz would only go for something really special. It's been in the family too long.
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Great-looking 4001, to be sure. BUT, is the TRC on it period-accurate? No way - no matter what the seller states. As for the treble pickup assembly, I'm not sure what to make of it.
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Image
Does that look like a late'60s/early '70s TRC to any of you? Notice it is slightly shorter and narrower, which means post-1971. No?
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
User avatar
elysrand
Advanced Member
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 6:00 am

Post by elysrand »

You are right, Sérgio, I think. The lettered addition of "MODEL 4001" is missing from all mine until after late 1971 early 1972, then it appears.

It is likely that this is a replacement TRC.
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, and sit in with the band whenever you can, to keep your chops up!
User avatar
ajish4
RRF Moderator
Posts: 8566
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 6:00 am

Post by ajish4 »

Hey Kevin,

Are you REALLY going to sell the Jazz?

Hmmmm.....
"Freedom of expression is important, but I have learned that people want to know how much you care before they care how much you know."
The only time a bass player gets noticed is when he stops playing.
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

You could be right on the TRC Sergio. My '69 has "Made in USA" running parallel to the nut.

The surround looks fine to me. Same bobbin too, similar to my '69, except this one's on the right way!

That wing "lifting" is common on the 60's basses where Roto's have been used. The thin neck does flex and twist when under all those years of tension. My green '64 RM1999 has a degree of it too.

This is a bass that usually gets a lot of attention. Nothing jumps out at you as unusual. The original body has no routs and the seller has given a very complete description. A true vintage finish, well worn in hardware and vibe by the bucketload.

I hope he gets a bucketload for it....
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

I agree Sergio, the TRC looks to be early to mid 70's.

I also think you're right regarding the surround, corners are a wee bit to sharp.

Under the hood, there looks to have been resoldering of some kind going on, there are joints that are much cleaner with less oxidation than the others, also I don't think the big caps are the originals either

69 was the year the headstock was shortened, not sure of the month / quarter however.
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”