Ric12 vs Ric12
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Ric12 vs Ric12
Hey gang. I was rehearsing some tunes the other day with a bandmate and noticed something surprising.
Here's the situation: I was on the Rick 12 going through ROS with neck pu thru a Fender Princeton Chorus, and the bridge pu thru a Roland JC77. The other guitarist was playing a nice Schecter through a Fender Deluxe. We had a drum machine going through some heavy duty reference monitors.
First I was playing the '90 370/12SPC (with original toasters, I believe) and was getting some killer jangle without even using any compression.
After a few songs, I switched to the J Dog Rick ('00 330/12 with new scatterwound toasters) and the sound got real thin. So I have some questions for the experts here:
Was it the type of toaster? the absence of the third pickup?
Also, I noticed with the 370, my neck tone was really really dull, even though when blended the guitar sounded great.
Thanks - J
Here's the situation: I was on the Rick 12 going through ROS with neck pu thru a Fender Princeton Chorus, and the bridge pu thru a Roland JC77. The other guitarist was playing a nice Schecter through a Fender Deluxe. We had a drum machine going through some heavy duty reference monitors.
First I was playing the '90 370/12SPC (with original toasters, I believe) and was getting some killer jangle without even using any compression.
After a few songs, I switched to the J Dog Rick ('00 330/12 with new scatterwound toasters) and the sound got real thin. So I have some questions for the experts here:
Was it the type of toaster? the absence of the third pickup?
Also, I noticed with the 370, my neck tone was really really dull, even though when blended the guitar sounded great.
Thanks - J
- beatlefreak
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
- Contact:
- soundmasterg
- RRF Consultant
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 1:06 pm
- beatlefreak
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
- Contact:

