Set neck versus through neck
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- pflash4001
- Member
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:52 am
- Contact:
- bassduke49
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6580
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
Javier, the 4001 (and its replacement, the 4003) is the deluxe model with binding on the body and neck and "shark fin" or triangular position markers on the fretboard. The 4001S (and its replacements, the 4003S and the Vintage models 4001V63 and 4001C64) have no binding and simple dots for position markers. Below are examples of both; an '07 Amber Fireglo 4003 and a '97 Fireglo 4001V63.


Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
- pflash4001
- Member
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:52 am
- Contact:
- bassduke49
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6580
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
Yeah, it is odd, isn't it? For those wondering, the typical V63 shouldn't have a position-marker dot on the 19th fret. Don't know why, but mine does. Standard S models have it, so it was probably a fretboard made for an S and grabbed on the line by mistake. No biggie.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
a bit late chiming in-i have a 74 4000 set-neck that i love. it has been strung with pyramids for 3 years,but i recently changed to dr sunbeams for a different sound. it sounds really good with both string types,I'm thinking of trying some rotosound tapes on it,but am not sure if the tuners will accomodate the large e string. mine has the huge open-back reverse tuning keys with the teeny posts....
'74 4000 White
'98 4004Ci
'04 4004Cii MG Fretless conversion
'04 4004 Laredo FG 4002v57 Custom
'98 4004Ci
'04 4004Cii MG Fretless conversion
'04 4004 Laredo FG 4002v57 Custom
-
just_bassics
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:12 am


