70s Rick/Grover tuners revisited
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
70s Rick/Grover tuners revisited
I'm cross-posting this for Rick12dr, he's having server problems and hasn't been able to access here:
I was digging through my old catalog collection the other day, and found a 70s Grover catalog I'd sent for.Here's some specifics describing the closed box tuner found on Rick basses:these are referred to as; "Slimline Electric Bass Machine with "Contour" Butterfly Buttons".
The model # is 140C[2 on a side; was also available 4-in-line!].Price in mid 70s listed at $25.
Gear ratio is 18 to 1.
I thought this might be of interest to some of you guys.
I was digging through my old catalog collection the other day, and found a 70s Grover catalog I'd sent for.Here's some specifics describing the closed box tuner found on Rick basses:these are referred to as; "Slimline Electric Bass Machine with "Contour" Butterfly Buttons".
The model # is 140C[2 on a side; was also available 4-in-line!].Price in mid 70s listed at $25.
Gear ratio is 18 to 1.
I thought this might be of interest to some of you guys.
My 4001 has them.....but....thats of no interest to me
I actually managed to finally repair mine - they are the worst bass tuners ever.
I had to get one re- tabbed and welded so it doesnt explode.
I actually managed to finally repair mine - they are the worst bass tuners ever.
I had to get one re- tabbed and welded so it doesnt explode.
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
-
rhampshire
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 322
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2000 2:47 pm
There was a set of Grover Slimlines on Ebay a few weeks ago that were I think the model 140CH's that Paul has up in the window, they won't fit a Ric. Instead of putting the string down the middle of the shaft you put it through the hole in the post. When they are mounted on a Ric bass the hole is too low to put the string through. They looked identical though.
yeah i reckon if you grovers are broken , or missing, dont bother getting replacements. They are not very good tuner design.
They keep the bass in tune well, look ok, but just fall apart..... they are a silly design. the square back is all that keeps the things held together.
They keep the bass in tune well, look ok, but just fall apart..... they are a silly design. the square back is all that keeps the things held together.
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
- rickenbrother
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 13217
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am
I agree that those Grover tuners are not the best tuners to have on your bass. I'd prefer my '73 4001 had Schallers, but I don't want to modify it.
I had to repair my Grover tuners too. They would fall apart when I'd loosen tension to change strings. I removed the bad tuners from the headstock and carefully applied a small amount of epoxy to the 4 posts that hold the "box" on to the plate. They are holding up pretty good now.
I had to repair my Grover tuners too. They would fall apart when I'd loosen tension to change strings. I removed the bad tuners from the headstock and carefully applied a small amount of epoxy to the 4 posts that hold the "box" on to the plate. They are holding up pretty good now.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! 
These came off my old 69-70 Dan Armstrong ,
http://a2.cpimg.com/image/EC/CD/23830252-a68a-02210199-.jpg
http://a2.cpimg.com/image/EC/CD/23830252-a68a-02210199-.jpg
- squirebass
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 11:05 pm
I agree with you Bob, I like those older ones that are reversed, and I have Grovers on my '71 hate to say I like them but they work pretty well!
But I definitely prefer the look of the old Klusons...
Oh and Bob, please check yer email...
But I definitely prefer the look of the old Klusons...
Oh and Bob, please check yer email...
"This is the big one, Elizabeth, I'm coming to join ya, honey!"
