Refinish JG or MG ??

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
kidvett
New member
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 1:49 pm

Refinish JG or MG ??

Post by kidvett »

I recently bought a 1974 4001 that has seen quite some use...JetGlo finish is well worn and I'm considering having it refinished by a luthier...( posted in a different tread ``74 4001 w/changed electronics``)

Question is JetGlo or natural maple finish ?? I'm not sure it has not been repainted black as some areas show heavy sanding, especially on the back. I already have a 4003 MG with black trim and it would make a great companion to have this one in MG but with the white pickguard & chromed parts...

One area I need info on is the small black area below the binding on the body. I figure that this ``small black line`` is the matching color of the bass when assembled...The picture shows it... How is that area filled on a MG white binding RIC ?? Is it white or natural ??I want to get as much information as possible before deciding to refinish...

Thanks for the ideas & opinions on this one

Marc

Image
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

If I'm interpreting that pic correctly, there is a void in the Maple - the through-body neck slab, that has been routed out. Normally there is just wood for the neck slab and the binding is only on the wings. Am I seeing that right?
kidvett
New member
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 1:49 pm

Post by kidvett »

Hello John,

Yes you see this correctly, it's the rear part of the body where the neck slab joins the wings. I'm curious as to the black line below the binding strip ?? Is that filled with varnish ( or other ) on a mapleglo finished RIC ?? Seems it's a blank area...

Another pic of the same...On the E string side of the bridge...

Marc
Image
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Post by bassduke49 »

My guess is that is the original Jetglo color that has not chipped off the binding and adhesive. Weathering and wear will more easily chip the paint from the wood, but the paint sticks better to adhesive and perhaps the binding which might be a bit deeper than it appears. I think the painting process in the factory has the painter spray right over the binding, then after the color is dry, the paint is scraped off the binding with a razor blade tool. Then the clear coats are applied. I'll bet if you carefully scrape this black line, you'll reveal a tiny bit more binding strip.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
chrisdski
Intermediate Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:15 pm

Post by chrisdski »

I have an 82 4001 mapleglo- my binding is tight up against the wood- there is no gap that has been filled. I think Paul's explanation above explains what you are seeing.
User avatar
s4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3514
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by s4001 »

Arctic white. All the way.
"If you think you can or if you think you cannot - either way you are right." Henry Ford.
kidvett
New member
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 1:49 pm

Post by kidvett »

Many thanks to all the good advices & info I received on that one. I have stripped it to discover beautiful walnut under...Most of it is done and the luthier will take care of the rest...I will probably go for a natural finish which should look good with the stripe, white pickguard and chrome parts...I have a MG w/black trim & parts so it gonna make a nice pair...

Marc


Image
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

Well, Marc, it ain't walnut. It's maple and the "stripe" is shedua. Should look tasty done up as you describe!
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
rikk
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 3:04 pm

Post by rikk »

Marc,
That looks really nice. If you are daring have your luthier put walnut wings on the headstock.
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Post by rickfan63 »

That would look really nice!
I recently went back to playing a Rickenbacker bass. Its like meeting an old friend again
kidvett
New member
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 1:49 pm

Post by kidvett »

Sorry for the mistake in the wood...I am supposed to know it's maple but I guess I've been collecting firearms too long and made a mistake typing on the computer....Paul, thanks for getting me ``back into line`` on the wood issue...

Headstock pic:
Image

Rikk,

Walnut wings ?? How is the luthier gonna do that ?? Remove the wings ?? Custom make the new ones ?? I dont have any idea on this....and I guess not too many luthiers have experience into this here in Quebec, Canada...

Marc
User avatar
johneek
Advanced Member
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:23 am

Post by johneek »

I'm sure that either Paul or Dale could do this for you without a problem.

Here is a link to a slide show where that very modification is part of customizing a 350.

http://s11.photobucket.com/albums/a172/RSnyder459/Custom%20Ric%20350%20/
aragorn35016
New member
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:55 am

Post by aragorn35016 »

Wow thats the most impressive restoration (or alteration) that I have ever seen. Whoever did that is awesome!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”