Pictures of your Rickenbacker bass

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

mortivan

Post by mortivan »

Image
User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Post by wim »

Image
User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Post by wim »

Image
My '74 4001 Bass
It started life as a jetglo, when I bought it is was Fireglo but I refinished it to Mapleglo.
This bass has suffered a lot.

Image

Closeup, you can see spots of rust on the hardware

Image

The nut was replaced with a brass one before I bought it, I rhodium plated it.

Image

The original tuners were replaced by Schallers (again, the previous owner did this)
I've had this bass in my posession for about 12 years now and couldn't do a day without it.
It sounds and plays very different to other 4001's or 4003's I've played.
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Hi Wim
I can't access your photos, maybe because I'm in an internet cafe. I have a 79 4001 with a wooden nut and no varnish on the neck (I think it may have be refretted at some time before I bought it) as the frets ride on top of the binding rather than under it as my 78 does which is all original. It too plays and sounds different than other Rics, I like it a lot, the wooden nut and neck with no varnish tones down the brightness and sustain a little, which I like.
ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

Wim - ha! you think that bass has suffered ! My 73 has been worn to the bone but with a big clean and a few little fixes is a fantastic bass. Unlike your 74, it was all original.

It a black one and besides a neck toaster pickup is essentially just like yours. The early 70's one are great eh?

I think i know what you mean by it not playing like most ricks. My 73 has a very flat, chunky neck, with really squared off binding and lower profile frets. Takes a bit of getting used to but its very unique
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
User avatar
paul_yan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2119
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 2:09 pm
Contact:

Post by paul_yan »

Great photos, Wim.
Your baby has got nice looking maple!
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Hey Owen, I think chunky and flat mean opposite things to most players, chunky means fat, thick etc. from the fretboard to the back of the neck, if your 73 is anything like my 72 is and my 75 was, flat;thin is a better way to describe it.
ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

lol Bob yeah.....i kinda was trying to say, flat fretboard radius,,, wide and thin......

Help! i dunno wot im saying but yeah an almost totally flat fretboard
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Post by wim »

Mine has the normal fretboard radius (still the original lacquer on it) but the backside of the neck is very flat.
Maybe that's because of all the sanding and refinishing it went through.
At the 16th fret it's only 15/16th of an inch thick, fretboard included
If I put heavy strings on it I have a handbow rather than a bass guitar.
I don't mind though, it plays very fast and I don't hit the strings hard anyway.
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Wim:
You've made an interesting comment regarding your 1974 4001. 'It sounds and plays very different to other 4001s and 4003s I've played.' That's exactly how I would describe my June 1974 Jetglo 4001! I believe the (slightly underwound) pickups and the neck shape on both our 1974 4001s account for said vivid difference.
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
ojobob2
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ojobob2 »

Sergio - yeah exactly - the basses around that time seem noticably different to play than even the later 70's ones.
The email address shown is down, you can email me at [email protected]
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Yeah, my 72 (even though it's a fretless) and my 75 had identical thin necks. Same radius necks; I think all the early 70's necks were like that, I'm not positive though. And the pickups are noticably thinner sounding. (to me)
User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Post by wim »

Hey Sérgio, mine's 'birthday' is July '74 that's not that far apart Image
You mentioned something very interesting: you believe the pickups are slightly underwound.
Is this a known 'problem'?
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6261
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

How about an action pic?
Image
"Knowledge is Power"
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Nice bass Scott what year is it? it looks like one of the newer ones with the long headstock.
I don't think Sérgio means that it is a problem Wim, just that they had less turns of wire back then which accounted for the special clear trebly Ric bass sound (along with the treble cap).
He can fill you in much more than I can.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”