1972 Gibson EBO
Moderator: jingle_jangle
Well, I put the Chromes on and it is fine with them. I forgot I had the Rumble 60 at work tweaked for mucho bass. With the chromes and a little boost for mids and trebles, it is FINE!!! I like my mids so I am not using the mid scoop button......... I still need the vintage knobs. This one has speed knobs.
With the SVT I may even be able to duplicate something close to Mel's tone on "Inside Looking Out"........although it may take an 8x10 at minimum for that tone. It is most pronounced on that cut. The rest of his stuff just seems like a P bass rocking through tubes!
With the SVT I may even be able to duplicate something close to Mel's tone on "Inside Looking Out"........although it may take an 8x10 at minimum for that tone. It is most pronounced on that cut. The rest of his stuff just seems like a P bass rocking through tubes!
I think the neck pickup alone is OK with a little natural distortion, it may sound different in an EB-0 than it does in an EB-3. I'm not sure, all I know is that all I get with neck alone on my EB-3 is bottom bottom bottom.
Mel Schacter (sp?) used a late 60's J bass and a pick. In fact he's the reason I bought my first Fender, their second album (the red one with Inside Looking Out) had a J bass on the cover.
I like Gibsons though, I have a new Thunderbird and an old EB-3 and have had an EB-2 which sounded much less bottomy than my EB-3's neck pickup alone.
Your EB-0 sounds like an interesting and rare bass.
Mel Schacter (sp?) used a late 60's J bass and a pick. In fact he's the reason I bought my first Fender, their second album (the red one with Inside Looking Out) had a J bass on the cover.
I like Gibsons though, I have a new Thunderbird and an old EB-3 and have had an EB-2 which sounded much less bottomy than my EB-3's neck pickup alone.
Your EB-0 sounds like an interesting and rare bass.
I'm glad the neck pup is away from the neck, it is not quite as "boomy" IMHO.
At 6:24 if you pause, it is a jazz with a humbucker for the neck pup. At speed I thought it was a pup cover!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0x6chChxzV0
At 6:24 if you pause, it is a jazz with a humbucker for the neck pup. At speed I thought it was a pup cover!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0x6chChxzV0
Yeah, you're right, he got the same exact tone live as he got on the record, one of my all time favorite bass tones. It is probably an EB-0 pickup, that was fairly common back then, I traded an early 70's Tele bass with a big humbucker in it for a 68 P bass in 1977 which had a humbucker next to the neck, they liked bottom back then, haha! The guy I got it from wanted it back so I gave it to him, had to get a new pickguard.
I have heard that moving the humbucker didn't change the tone much on them as it is the pickup itself which is wound to about 25K which gives it the bottom, the mud comes from lousy amps.
I have heard that moving the humbucker didn't change the tone much on them as it is the pickup itself which is wound to about 25K which gives it the bottom, the mud comes from lousy amps.

