Neck Pickup Spacing

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Post by heinpete »

I prefer the 1" spacing as it is easier for slapping/pulling style. With the 1/2" spacing when slapping I sometimes hit the PU rather than the last fret. Also for the pulling with the 1/2" spacing, the PU is a bit obstructing in that location. However this is rather a rare playing style for a 4001.
"The youth of today should start thinking about the state in which they want to leave this planet to Keith Richards..."! Quote by an unknown musician
User avatar
deblase4001
Junior Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm

Post by deblase4001 »

I think the routing on my 75 4001 will only accommodate the 1/2" spacing. Opinions?

Now I just have to get that duncan out of the bridge position. I bought a new high gain from the botique w/ the adjustable poles. BUT I'm trying to decide if I should I have the original pickup repaired and put it back in.

Btw, nice bass ED.

ImageImage
______________________________
1974 4001 Fireglo, 1975 4001 Jetglo
User avatar
gothbin
Junior Member
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:00 am

Post by gothbin »

Greg, how does the SD sound compared to an original Ric PU? Always wondered how they sound.
Beside owning 14 guitars and basses and my own homestudio, what do I want more?
User avatar
deblase4001
Junior Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm

Post by deblase4001 »

Robin, the SD is a lot louder and fatter sounding but to me it has a more generic sound. It doesn't have that distinctive rickenbacker growl that the original pickup had.
______________________________
1974 4001 Fireglo, 1975 4001 Jetglo
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Post by rickenbrother »

The SD's would be louder than the older higain pickups but not louder than the new ones. In either case, installing the SD's in your 4001/4003 will kill the Rick tone. If you want a humbucking pickup that is even louder, go with the RIC HB1.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
lucky
Member
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 5:00 am

Post by lucky »

I said this on the Ric forum,and it was took the wrong way by some members.
For me the best Ric tone has always come from the Ric pickups,recently i have moved my neck pickup to the half inch posistion and there was a difference.I guess there are pro's & cons to both neck pickup posistions.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

Shawn, having played my 4003 in the 1" position for quite a while before moving the toaster to the 1/2" position, I agree.
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Post by rickfan63 »

I had the neck pickup move to the 1/2 inch position too and added a vintage pickguard on my 4003MB. It really helped the looks of the bass, and the sound has a little more low end to it. I've been really happy with it. A vintage pickguard alone, though would help the cosmetics of the bass regardless of the neck pickup position.
I recently went back to playing a Rickenbacker bass. Its like meeting an old friend again
User avatar
lucky
Member
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 5:00 am

Post by lucky »

I bought a V63 style scratchplate from Rickysounds here in the UK,& the bass does look & sound better in the 1/2" position.I hope that one day Rickenbacker will sell the horseshoe pickup & the split tailpiece,as an after market part to complete the vintage style look.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”