Repeating this thread over here too.

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

big_g

Repeating this thread over here too.

Post by big_g »

This sight has some major Ric collectable guitars, there is one bass under the Rickenback link 72' checkerboard JetGlo, but you have got to see the one under the bass link. Wow! an amazing condition 63' 4001 in FireGlo. One can only dream! I can't afford them but I can appreciate.
http://www.garysguitars.com
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Pure magic!
Image
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
User avatar
marcinkus
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 224
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2001 3:40 am
Contact:

Post by marcinkus »

I'm droolin' ^_^
'96 4004C | '98 4003 | '00 4003vp | '05 4003 Custom | '08 4004Cii
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Well, any Rickenbacker bass is pure magic. This one is from late 1972.
Image
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

I'm on a roll here. I'm sure for many of you a 21 fret 4001 also is pure magic. This one, a February 1971, is or was owned by a Forum member, and is identical to my November 1970 21 fret 4001.
Image
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

The '63 4001 shown above would be pretty easy to re-create, from a manufacturing standpoint. This bass has solid edge-to-edge inlays rather than crushed-pearl. Take a 4001C64 in the early stages of production, add binding to the body and neck and an extra screw to the nameplate and (of course) the inlays, and voila---a 4001C63 is born. Make mine a lefty. Image Maybe it's not made EXACTLY like that, but my point is the C64 is a great starting point to go a bit further.....
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

I totally agree.
Meanwhile, keep the magic strong...
Image
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
User avatar
bigbajo60
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 912
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 8:15 pm

Post by bigbajo60 »

Is it my eyes deceiving me, or is that '63 equipped with a more modern, reissue horseshoe? I think I see the "scooped out" area for better string clearance on the pickup surround ring/mount.
My first bass was a Rickenbacker...
My best bass is a Rickenbacker...
My last bass may very well be a Rickenbacker
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

Alvaro: IMHO I think the whole bass is legit. You can go to Gary's website and see more close-up pics if you wish....
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Hmm... Now you got me thinking. I mean, the fact that the pickup surround on that 1963 4001 has a recess to accomodate the strings is not unusual - I've seen many pictures of '63 and '64 4001's with just such a feature. What intrigues me is that said recess is much shorter than on any '63 and '64 4001 I've seen. Are we indeed looking at a reissue horseshoe pickup, as Alvaro suggests, or is that the original horseshoe pickup assembly with a recess someone has cut on it somewhere along the line? Anyone?
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

The measurements of the horseshoe pickup covers varied considerably in the early 60's; some have very long tapers at the front, some are very square at the rear edge nearest the pickguard....

For reference, compare the shape of the cover belonging to the 1964 4001 in the Bacon & Day book to the original horseshoe cover on Paul McCartney's bass...quite different....also the 1963 4001MG in the Smith book....
big_g

Post by big_g »

I really think that Gary's is on the up and up here, he's asking a lot'o'dough in a very public way. I could be wrong here but I believe that that is a correct pickup.

Unless I hit the lottery, I won't have the dough for the '63, but she just makes my mind reel. I can't remember seeing one in that condition, that early, and for sale in a long time.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37505
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

"For reference, compare the shape of the cover belonging to the 1964 4001 in the Bacon & Day book"

Where is the photo of the 4001 in that book? I have it and the only bass I can find is the 4080.
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

John is referring not to 'The Rickenbacker Book', but to 'The Ultimate Guitar Book', wherein you can find a shot of a 1964 4001S on pages 164/165.
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

Ooops!!! LOL I meant "The Bass Book" by Bacon and (someone else)---sorry.

That book has the 1964 4001 ( not an 'S') for you to look at....
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”