Rickenbacker...over-rated?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Along the lines of the original topic (ahem!) I bought a 4001 BG in 1982. I have never done a set-up on it and, it plays fine for me. I recently bought a used 2002 4001c64 FG from POTR and it plays fantastic to my tastes right from Chris. Last year, I bought a 4004cii from POTR and it is my least favorite bass of the six I own. The action is high (can be fixed) and the tone is quite muddy and lacking any real definition.I suppose I'll keep it because it is a beauty and has value (Monty Brown), but I doubt that I will ever gig with it. Each one is different , and it is a liaibility to not be able to touch these things before purchasing! Oh, this is my first post here! Woodman
ps. Do any of you Northern Ohio guys have a good luthier to work on these gems? I could use a recommendation.
ps. Do any of you Northern Ohio guys have a good luthier to work on these gems? I could use a recommendation.
You can never have too much minimalism
- bassduke49
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6580
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
David, one thing about the 4004 is that, mainly due to their humbucking pickups, the tone is much more biased towards the bottom end with less top end. If the tone on your amp is set for single coils, the sound may be muddy. What you need to do is start flat and adjust it from there. If that still doesn't do it for you, you can switch to single coil RIC pickups. I have 4004's with both and while the tone from each is different, none of them are what I'd call muddy.
