Horseshoe / Hi Gain

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

zoomduck
Member
Posts: 445
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:07 pm

Post by zoomduck »

I allready tossed the horseshoe in the re-cycle bin .
More throttle...Less brakes
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

G R O A N ! !

Way to almost stop my heart, Barry! Very funny post - HA HA! Image Image
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

These days I am a big fan of the Ric hb1 pickups ... with 500k ohm volume pots and 1000k ohm tone pots they have a full low end, a real treble bite and a strong mid growl ...

I am also a fan of the modern high gain pickup ...
User avatar
Lost Coyotes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 900
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by Lost Coyotes »

Jeff, or anyone. What would you consider an '86?
Modern, post-vintage, etc.? I'm lost in the terms and variables. I do like the way it sounds.
"Why didn't I just learn how to cook"
zoomduck
Member
Posts: 445
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:07 pm

Post by zoomduck »

Well I ordered a new bridge high gain from RIC and it got here in 24 hours . It has the new adjustable poles and.........sounds alot like the 97 horseshoe . It is nice to have the cover out of the way . Im going to live with this bass for awhile and experiment with strings but I really expected it to sound like my 1977 4001 models . So far the 4004Cii with toasters nails my tone but fatigues my wonky shattered repaired wrist . Damn ! I will not give up my quest for a comfortable Rickenbacker bass . The V63 has the perfect body . The 4004Cii has the perfect tone and the 77 4001 had the perfect neck . Hmmmm....should I have bought a 4001S ? ? V to the bay ? here I go again Image
More throttle...Less brakes
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

The V63 has the perfect body . The 4004Cii has the perfect tone and the 77 4001 had the perfect neck . Hmmmm....


Send them all to Dale or Paul and have them combined into one bass that is just perfect for you! Image
User avatar
gearhed289
Intermediate Member
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:51 am
Contact:

Post by gearhed289 »

"Tom, what is the "hot" toaster in terms of Ohms?"

I will check over the weekend, but I believe they are around 11.

"Jeff, or anyone. What would you consider an '86?
Modern, post-vintage, etc.?"

In my experience, I would say "post vintage". The original pups in my '89 were relatively weak at about 8k. I think it was about '90 that they beefed them up. Jeff?

"I ordered a new bridge high gain from RIC and it got here in 24 hours . It has the new adjustable poles and.........sounds alot like the 97 horseshoe"

I had the same results. Very happy with the sound, and the adjustable poles are a great upgrade.
'89 4003S, '92 4001CS, '93 4003S/8
www.nomadichorizonband.com
herk
New member
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:44 am

Post by herk »

"honey bunny" dark, mysterious, and otherworldly.
possibly a perfect song.

why didn't you respond ?
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

Barry, you probably need to unwind that high gain bridge pup to what the '77 bass had for ohms on its bridge pup. Wood (neck) differences also explain some of the tone difference.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

by late 1986 to early 1990 the 4003 had the "modern features" ... no cap, 11k ohm pickups, modern truss rods, 250k ohm tone pots (1990), no grover tuners, no 2 piece pickguard, etc.
zoomduck
Member
Posts: 445
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:07 pm

Post by zoomduck »

Spent an hour with the V playing through an ampeg B25B this morning ( ahh retirement ) . I think all is well with the new configuration . The tone is different but excellent . Had I known about this forum a few years ago I would have had my first 77 4001 (hall of shame bass) rebuilt by the likes of Dale or Paul . That would have been a narrow neck , high gain , no binding comfortable bass . The V63 is now very close and probably a better investment IF I should ever sell her . The quest for tone/comfort never ends and keeps me out of trouble Image
More throttle...Less brakes
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by thx1955 »

Barry,
If you get a chance try Ric-O-Sound into the B25's two channels, I run my 4003 this way with great results, my v63 and now c64 I run mono into it, but the 4003 with both channels running sounds lovely, I'm seriously thinking about a master volume control for the B25, superb little amp !!
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
zoomduck
Member
Posts: 445
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:07 pm

Post by zoomduck »

Jim . Im down to the V and 4004 so no stereo basses at the moment . I bet that Ric-O-Sound is outstanding . Like you I also really like the B25 . Pleny of power and great tube warmth . Let me know if you do the master mod in the future .
More throttle...Less brakes
User avatar
chefothefuture
Advanced Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am

Post by chefothefuture »

I believe that the Hi-Gain pu's magnet is
a magnetized rubber, not a ceramic.
You can bend 'em into all sorts of shapes.
They work great at getting stuff out of the shower drain.....
I don't think ceramic magnets will bend....
'68 4001MG, '70 4001 21Fret, '71 4001S MG, '71 4001FG, '72 4001AZ, '73 4001FG, '73 4001resto, '59 365FG, '96 381/12v69FG, '71 4001 21Fret FG
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

Thanks for correcting my earlier post, John. Not sure why I said ceramic.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”