I need your opinion on this guitar, Mr. Mudge!

Exceptional restoration is in the details

Moderator: jingle_jangle

User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

.010-.012 set, roughly...years ago, players would sometimes use .008 and .009 Slinky sets on these. Problems ensued.
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

I am not positive what's on it now (they feel too light, though) but I am going to put .010s on it first. Right now the B sharps a bit and the lower strings were a bit sharp at first so I angled the bridge back a bit and it is better.
dale_fortune
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:00 am

Post by dale_fortune »

Here's what most all the English players from Clapton to Harrison did in the early 60's: some used flat wounds and some used round wounds. Most gages had a high E of .012 0r .013 with a wound G. They would toss the .056 or .060 low E pushing the string set up and replacing the high E with a .010 Banjo string...In the mid 60's Ernie Ball changed all that. Rock&Roll Baby..
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

That is interesting info; I am not sure I could handle .013s! .011s maybe. I still want to bend them a little bit without killing me.
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Post by paologregorio »

I played with an .11-.52 set for awhile. It was okay, but I like the .10-.52 set better for doing bends, except on the Ricks, on which I use a .10-.46 set. The only guitar I've used a .12 set on is my `53 Gretsch Electromatic, but I think I have a lighter set on it now-I'm not sure, the luthier put the last pair of strings on it for me after dressing the frets, et cetera:
Image
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

Nice! Can you post a closeup of the bridge on your Electromatic?
User avatar
elysrand
Advanced Member
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 6:00 am

Re: I need your opinion on this guitar, Mr. Mudge!

Post by elysrand »

That IS a really good-looking Gretsch Electromatic!

I don't have one of those yet.
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, and sit in with the band whenever you can, to keep your chops up!
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: I need your opinion on this guitar, Mr. Mudge!

Post by jingle_jangle »

MY eyes go immediately to that cracking DeArmond single-coil. It's a classic pickup.
User avatar
elysrand
Advanced Member
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 6:00 am

Re: I need your opinion on this guitar, Mr. Mudge!

Post by elysrand »

jingle_jangle wrote:MY eyes go immediately to that cracking DeArmond single-coil. It's a classic pickup.
And made by Rowe Industries, same as the pickup in a 1957 Rick Combo 400, right? :mrgreen:
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: I need your opinion on this guitar, Mr. Mudge!

Post by jingle_jangle »

Same manufacturer, but dfferent pickups. We know all about that situation, don't we, Dr. Rand? :oops:
Post Reply

Return to “Reflections of a Curmudgeon: by Paul Wilczynski”